IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] WGLC: "Considerations for the use of DNS Reverse Mapping"

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@commandprompt.com> Thu, 05 June 2008 20:50 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsop-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop-archive@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsop-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F64C3A683E; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 13:50:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA433A683E for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 13:50:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.487
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.487 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.248, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TI9wtQ1Qzhjs for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 13:50:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-159.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.159]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4B73A6819 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 13:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from commandprompt.com (227-54-222-209.mycybernet.net [209.222.54.227]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m55KphNo017875 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 13:51:46 -0700
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 16:50:12 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@commandprompt.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20080605205011.GB47812@commandprompt.com>
References: <20080314034500.GE7553@x27.adm.denic.de> <20080605100424.GA26460@nic.fr> <20080605192813.GK28936@elvis.mu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080605192813.GK28936@elvis.mu.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (lists.commandprompt.com [207.173.203.159]); Thu, 05 Jun 2008 13:51:47 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WGLC: "Considerations for the use of DNS Reverse Mapping"
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org

On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 12:28:13PM -0700, bill fumerola wrote:

> there were several issues opened when WGLC was made, i can't find
> where these were made to see if they've been addressed in the most
> recent draft. this was referred to as issue 20.

I didn't update the draft, because nobody (and in particular, the
people whose objections I was trying to address) responded to the
suggestions.  My feeling before the WGLC was that things were ok.  My
feeling after the comments I received in WGLC was that there was a
problem with the definitions (which definitely need fixing).  I tried
to find some different language to address the other objections, but
since nobody responded to my suggestions, I just concluded they didn't
care that much (or wouldn't be satisfied regardless).  I'm hoping for
direction from the WG on what to do with these things.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@commandprompt.com
+1 503 667 4564 x104
http://www.commandprompt.com/
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email