Re: [DNSOP] [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-peetterr-dnsop-parent-side-auth-types-00.txt]

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Fri, 25 September 2020 20:59 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9486F3A095D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 13:59:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.918
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.918 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ezoj8dCxkltj for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 13:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF8D03A0957 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 13:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:56732) by ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.136]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1kLuoU-000CGi-0t (Exim 4.92.3) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Fri, 25 Sep 2020 21:59:30 +0100
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 21:59:30 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
cc: Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>, "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAH1iCirfsQ-DPo97OjeNiRLLwF_1bZMYkvremfMZCK3hCeVSJw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2009252150230.18300@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <160096974346.12277.16853345396397035889@ietfa.amsl.com> <702a5de3ddcef844aeb80b4c071ee9559aaac650.camel@powerdns.com> <CAH1iCirfsQ-DPo97OjeNiRLLwF_1bZMYkvremfMZCK3hCeVSJw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/B655Xjj7zgJzqX2CQIUOsbOWyjI>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-peetterr-dnsop-parent-side-auth-types-00.txt]
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 20:59:35 -0000

Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This doesn't even address the significant challenges of developing a
> method of passing the information from the domain owner (registrant) to
> the parent name server (registry). The current mechanism of EPP, does
> not even accommodate the DNS operator unless the DNS operator is also
> the registrar.

Yes, I was going to say something along these lines.

Tangentially I suppose this is a case where the (common) EPP distinction
between domain objects and host objects might (shock, horror) be useful:
maybe we could in principle allow a DNS operator to manage information
about their servers independently of the domains that they host.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Lands End to St Davids Head including the Bristol Channel: Northwest 5 to 7,
veering north 4 to 6. Rough at first in southwest, otherwise slight or
moderate. Showers. Good, occasionally moderate.