IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Re: Mohamed Boucadair's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-sha1-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Mon, 21 April 2025 22:33 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 774551F0BAEF; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 15:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vmPhU6caHGam; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 15:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppa2.lax.icann.org (ppa2.lax.icann.org [192.0.33.77]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3CA21F0BAD5; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 15:33:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MBX112-E2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (out.mail.icann.org [64.78.33.7]) by ppa2.lax.icann.org (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTPS id 53LMX6Cd023359 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 21 Apr 2025 22:33:06 GMT
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) by MBX112-W2-CO-2.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.130) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 15:33:05 -0700
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([169.254.44.235]) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([169.254.44.235]) with mapi id 15.02.1544.011; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 15:33:05 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: Mohamed Boucadair <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Thread-Topic: [Ext] [DNSOP] Re: Mohamed Boucadair's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-sha1-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHbswu6sGRkjpVEb0e6/QP+tq5VD7OvKfIA
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 22:33:05 +0000
Message-ID: <134C4B8A-95D8-4621-9559-E98C7530C504@icann.org>
References: <174453560483.1099397.15288329283858358772@dt-datatracker-64c5c9b5f9-hz6qg> <ybl5xix9mye.fsf@wd.hardakers.net>
In-Reply-To: <ybl5xix9mye.fsf@wd.hardakers.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <F13E1A1221112D479E4690362A33ADBC@pexch112.icann.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1095,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.68.34 definitions=2025-04-21_10,2025-04-21_02,2024-11-22_01
Message-ID-Hash: 64OF4GCAQFVMB23RC7RC5OKNBLCH7PDR
X-Message-ID-Hash: 64OF4GCAQFVMB23RC7RC5OKNBLCH7PDR
X-MailFrom: paul.hoffman@icann.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-sha1@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-sha1@ietf.org>, "dnsop-chairs@ietf.org" <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Re: Mohamed Boucadair's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-sha1-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/BFxPT6G3aO8ssMGIfhSc6iwbQBM>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>

On Apr 21, 2025, at 15:19, Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> wrote:

. . .

>> # BCP237 Umbrella
>> 
>> As a big fun of BCP237, I wonder whether we should make this more visible in
>> our DNSSEC “roadmap” documentation and list this document under the BCP237
>> umbrella?
> 
> So BCP237 currently only has one document within it (RFC9364).  I think
> if we added every future DNSSEC document to the BCP it would likely get
> overwhelming.  I would argue that whether or not and how often we should
> update BCP237 is a good discussion for the WG as a whole, but it's
> outside the scope of this particular document (set).  But that's very much IMHO.

As the (current) author of BCP 237, I fully agree with Wes here. It is now a bit over two years old; starting an update later this year seems appropriate, even if it just adds a few bullet points for new documents. Doing so absolutely should not block this draft.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status