Re: [DNSOP] WG review of draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 21 March 2017 02:48 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA14A1316E9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 19:48:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4HjaA1iuXXb3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 19:48:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22a.google.com (mail-qk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7388B1316EB for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 19:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id y76so125646418qkb.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 19:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=9gvcw0tzEJfqIyrLw62pi9MHmBKGluoZCZhH6crMCLM=; b=GSZ5U1OGb6FsI8rKTchAuEJToqD4HYMA6npIzy6JICWjNCvEe+egDOHMyrS61qczpf SiskhKcDcI/aEBZh6rZWv91BwayXm8MKs5NwVVSnGw40dkmQQfYN5SAxiDl5YNV5IF8w wEJcm1jAUdmfuRzbzQZsvL68E/DjK7O+0lXA/lUkIALVZPMcq/lZ+xBDkTV0iLhXc6O/ b1JfYYA5r9OPEtlxQaTeGbrS2oF+/d40GeUkWKs++jYk88K16Bgv94PZTOILNmJk0BqK UcCWEnlQP+Jhp/qUCOgcC00y+1pYh4+6s8n155xMXpAOqBi63QxZvP0kHMIsgn2Tqb1Y rQ3w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to :in-reply-to:message-id; bh=9gvcw0tzEJfqIyrLw62pi9MHmBKGluoZCZhH6crMCLM=; b=cj3KHY/Ia6IYCOpV0EwBFzbopv+hKdXi4k+HE6cU8JT3BYy6DwNhT7gLKARML9ntvi Jp2ahwGPOFN6l74Ps0+TiFBQaVTCCK9zvtajcXzWw74CkU9KtCQxkNWdZUudx8DG92P5 ZQLFxtPY3+AlRvtEzfXqmPRyXsSlTiZWcCaB8baEcqWmWb4UvZkkK1g9mfTAuE9YM33U dzCrFWD6CNuiWAh4U1Ijp6OuHrZJa7QizIXf/Kid5l+9cyldMxHMDkj/UaCh1ZCiyaVb pJyIIWv8uOvDF8gYXelunuPy4LoSszIyCK4uQXNKNR1ZSL7+piuzIZGbwo5F6hlbIoN8 CPmg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3A+W7XfFNQPEjKldnhMdVHj2TIXjx1B+DRUDrfiOPogn4UeAn3vi+8GZ0CsCQWBw==
X-Received: by 10.55.177.193 with SMTP id a184mr29912270qkf.210.1490064511479; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 19:48:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.30.228] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s28sm13774044qts.65.2017.03.20.19.48.30 for <dnsop@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Mar 2017 19:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0DCA87A6-633A-4CCE-BC9D-7FB275F5C488"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 22:48:28 -0400
References: <60C85486-E351-4C42-ADEB-FCBB56F4EA27@fugue.com> <AB11455F-7E43-4CB3-9F13-DB6A09F739EB@vigilsec.com> <CEC8CC6A-861A-471C-B7FA-4BB05C81CCF0@gmail.com> <F7AA49EF-2708-4948-9B60-6660DA6BC841@vigilsec.com> <734EC35A-4B1F-43EB-BE37-C34CA46BDA26@fugue.com> <203D2BEA-1008-48A0-9CE2-1FD621C6117F@shinkuro.com> <3134EDC2-FB00-41EA-8338-6E6B196137F1@fugue.com> <572B4EBA-F37F-4E92-A252-44BAF5DE7FF5@shinkuro.com> <20170321004827.GA25754@mournblade.imrryr.org> <72896FC4-5F63-4880-8C4B-A941A63B91B6@fugue.com> <20170321021538.GB25754@mournblade.imrryr.org>
To: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170321021538.GB25754@mournblade.imrryr.org>
Message-Id: <A11FC44B-B41E-41D4-B247-3187E750DB30@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Bc644bq2F8OjoX3i4b2YBAv7AX0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WG review of draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 02:48:37 -0000

On Mar 20, 2017, at 10:15 PM, Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> wrote:
> When I say "local", I don't mean on a nearby node on the local
> network, I mean the loopback interface, i.e. a process on the same
> device.

That would qualify as a stub resolver in the sense that we are talking about here: a resolver that is on the local host, and not on some server out there on the wire.   You're right to make the distinction, but I'm not sure what the right term is.