Re: [DNSOP] request for adoption

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Tue, 13 November 2018 06:19 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C5D130DD8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 22:19:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kDiwNMF0SDiw for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 22:19:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F145F130DD4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 22:19:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42vHX72M6xzJjS; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 07:19:19 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1542089959; bh=VlyjTr0jKpsL+jLHqnnv4OLtnYxM9/CXpW/ixo2l+X4=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=NTkyLx4dPeHuuqqsydCD812d1abdz366B/9yqyW/R0G+yWhFapOLVjHEQzjhSZVo5 ZARuZqVowFQ6vE8+0ZoXDpcan8g46w+GwkSITppFYCx7byZv2UJa0qTOf2cXgf5M2n P3mEZ3tnfSN+TgLi45vJ4d0romkEqSX1igNpX3bs=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zXseg-qwrw5r; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 07:19:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 07:19:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DDFB9319409; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 01:19:16 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca DDFB9319409
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2EF541C3B39; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 01:19:16 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 01:19:16 -0500 (EST)
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
cc: DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
In-Reply-To: <5881F57A-4C85-4B06-A079-59B58F432EC3@isc.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1811130117430.9026@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <87a7mefuz6.fsf@nic.cz> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1811130101010.9026@bofh.nohats.ca> <5881F57A-4C85-4B06-A079-59B58F432EC3@isc.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/BluDsIYStEwufcnPjyMYJBjrf28>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] request for adoption
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 06:19:22 -0000

On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Mark Andrews wrote:

>> DLV 	32769 	DNSSEC Lookaside Validation
>
> DLV isn’t obsolete.  The registry ISC published is gone but anyone can publish their own
> registry.

The question is if that is a bug or feature. I think it is a bug and its
time for the code base to remove this. It's ripe for abuse.

> SIG is NOT OBSOLETE.  It is used for SIG(0).  It’s use *for DNSSEC* is obsolete.
> KEY is NOT OBSOLETE.  It is used for SIG(0).  It’s use *for DNSSEC* is obsolete.

Ohhhh. Thanks for this. I didn't realise that!

Paul