Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?
"D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to> Wed, 30 May 2001 06:06 UTC
Received: from nic.cafax.se ([192.71.228.17]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id CAA28629 for <dnsop-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 30 May 2001 02:06:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5) id f4U5h9VK017519 for dnsop-outgoing; Wed, 30 May 2001 07:43:09 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from naptop.autonomica.se (flaptop.liman.sunet.se [193.10.90.102]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta5) with ESMTP id f4U5h4Lt017514 for <dnsop@cafax.se>; Wed, 30 May 2001 07:43:04 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by naptop.autonomica.se (8.12.0.Beta1/8.12.0.Beta1) id f4U5gvZZ000547 for dnsop@cafax.se; Wed, 30 May 2001 07:42:57 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from muncher.math.uic.edu (muncher.math.uic.edu [131.193.178.181]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta5) with SMTP id f4TNbxLt015213 for <dnsop@cafax.se>; Wed, 30 May 2001 01:38:00 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (qmail 569 invoked by uid 1001); 29 May 2001 23:23:01 -0000
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 23:23:01 -0000
Message-ID: <20010529232301.5659.qmail@cr.yp.to>
From: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to>
To: dnsop@cafax.se
Subject: Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?
References: <200105091818.f49II1Z05093@zed.isi.edu> <5696.989435370@brandenburg.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Precedence: bulk
Robert Elz writes: > Whether that happens for in-addr.arpa domains or not I am not sure, but > if you believe the reasoning for doing this (which is largely to force > glue to be provided) then it probably should. Right. If you create a reverse zone in the simplest possible way with tinydns, namely ./add-ns 3.2.1.in-addr.arpa 1.2.3.144, you get 3.2.1.in-addr.arpa. NS a.ns.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa. a.ns.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa. A 1.2.3.144 so that glue is always provided. Unfortunately, neither ARIN nor RIPE supports glue, despite the last paragraph of RFC 1034 section 4.2.2, so reverse lookups on the Internet are unnecessarily rickety. ---Dan
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Randy Bush
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Nathan Jones
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Woodcock
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Randy Bush
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cathy Murphy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Kenneth Porter
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cathy Murphy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Olaf Kolkman
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? itojun
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Peter Koch
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Peter Koch
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Kenneth Porter
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Checks performed during delegation. Bruce Campbell
- Re: Checks performed during delegation. Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? George Michaelson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: draft-durand-ngtrans-dns-issues-00.txt Jim Reid
- Re: draft-durand-ngtrans-dns-issues-00.txt Robert Elz