Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC in local networks
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Mon, 04 September 2017 15:28 UTC
Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D6F0132026 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 08:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p1--Xe8g_xNY for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 08:28:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C04D613219F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 08:28:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 500F8280591; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 17:28:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 500) id 4A3762805B3; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 17:28:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay01.prive.nic.fr (unknown [10.1.50.11]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43884280591; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 17:28:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.tech.ipv6.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay01.prive.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EAF860286A3; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 17:28:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3232E40360; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 17:28:29 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 17:28:29 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: "Walter H." <Walter.H@mathemainzel.info>
Cc: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20170904152829.tloxmujrwubliaqs@nic.fr>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1709012044210.2676@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <59A9BCA2.6060008@mathemainzel.info> <20170903043202.GA18082@besserwisser.org> <59AC4E42.9080600@mathemainzel.info> <60304450-DFA3-4982-B01D-CC33C49BDCFC@isc.org> <59f8c88caaf82a5884aa87223d49e7e4.1504505559@squirrel.mail> <3B75D240-13B9-4A94-B56D-24E83B4A4A8F@rfc1035.com> <3fe7bc511a990b0288b645dc176e1ef3.1504515284@squirrel.mail> <20170904150151.h7v3da7s3jp4yhec@nic.fr> <59AD6F92.9070108@mathemainzel.info>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <59AD6F92.9070108@mathemainzel.info>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 9.1
X-Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-3-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000009, version=1.2.2
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2017.9.4.151816
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Bvd61hi4kZ2WB-34fpEh3-HqxEg>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC in local networks
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 15:28:32 -0000
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 05:21:54PM +0200, Walter H. <Walter.H@mathemainzel.info> wrote a message of 114 lines which said: > when operating a local mail server that uses TLS for IMAP, SMTP, > then a Anti-virus has to break TLS in order to scan before it gets > to the client Which is also a very bad idea, giving the current state of such tools: http://users.encs.concordia.ca/~mmannan/publications/ssl-interception-ndss2016.pdf https://jhalderm.com/pub/papers/interception-ndss17.pdf
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Walter H.
- [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not only h… Walter H.
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Walter H.
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Walter H.
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Ralph Droms
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Måns Nilsson
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Walter H.
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Walter H.
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Walter H.
- [DNSOP] DNSSEC in local networks Jim Reid
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC in local networks Walter H.
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC in local networks Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC in local networks Jim Reid
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC in local networks Walter H.
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Måns Nilsson
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC in local networks Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC in local networks Walter H.
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC in local networks Petr Špaček
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC in local networks Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC in local networks Walter H.
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Walter H.
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC in local networks Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC in local networks Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC in local networks Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC in local networks Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC in local networks Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Michael H. Warfield
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC in local networks Walter H.
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC in local networks Walter H.
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Walter H.
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Walter H.
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Walter H.
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC in local networks Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC in local networks Walter H.
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Matthew Pounsett
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not on… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC in local networks Warren Kumari
- [DNSOP] Fwd: DNSSEC in local networks william manning