IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Favor: Weigh in on draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns?

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Mon, 26 November 2018 17:05 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5125A130F2D; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 09:05:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u-8lTk1qoD1e; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 09:04:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A089130F27; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 09:04:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:33234) by ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.139]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1gRKJd-000tmz-hr (Exim 4.91) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Mon, 26 Nov 2018 17:04:57 +0000
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 17:04:56 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
cc: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns.all@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <46B41554-ABC0-4939-99E3-703E1FD998D5@hopcount.ca>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1811261658250.3596@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <CAHw9_iL6CpLf6h_ysWEjvNjzaU2TPk-SyVGzLs_J9Yk_5A4OmA@mail.gmail.com> <46B41554-ABC0-4939-99E3-703E1FD998D5@hopcount.ca>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/CAkYT38KvIiLEl8G7idcyBF_tNA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Favor: Weigh in on draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 17:05:01 -0000

Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> wrote:
>
> It seems to me that the intended use-case is access to corporate-like
> network environments where intranet.corporate-like.com might exist on
> the inside but not on the outside.

More likely cases like corporate-like.local or corporate-like.int or
like.corp etc. usw. :-(

Private DNSSEC trust anchors should be distributed in the same way that
you would distribute corporate X.509 trust anchors.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
an equitable and peaceful international order

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email