Re: [DNSOP] WG review of draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03

Ted Lemon <> Mon, 20 March 2017 17:17 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521A213157A for <>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 10:17:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uQ7ewICkdzLM for <>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 10:17:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F09813151C for <>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 10:16:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id r45so112261806qte.3 for <>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 10:16:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=hMss7MPVmMPNU2lXE8OPJRc+dw6kDY9owLcqkgwP9Kg=; b=YPUYRASIxGaQmjsPATuQvaZafHDK/KqmQUqCtyN/EQ4B5Hhu+NiCZd4t5FxaA56uoE qDDxlEr+c8KqL9Z8nyPD/a/RYLSg3aQ4L0Cgg+mFIUXsIK+I4OZ5F3cw7ej3m1AAxmKo 3yypufoc1Ei3yR3LZGqWAaSxJajN9TZe+BygGnApnq/HDOxPKml8UY+Bhxt3QrSBrbhW zt7hMWnoxRtyDmkLa212fi8C0ZF0ixDQxE/0wN5mxHgYJMX0eMIBdYiljbC995Q9VVFC NgHZwcqLuhBIlHn+cHnQltxBDJ1wmTBzLdUOiyLxtF5oD6mk4wh635lE/6qIe4uzCYCv smlw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=hMss7MPVmMPNU2lXE8OPJRc+dw6kDY9owLcqkgwP9Kg=; b=l3Znd4XTVdhjm0K8PcGvLJCK3XeKVqN/gZDemiKeopriNDBau0M7Q0hB6iPRu2HLQW bw42OGTfc3dAo1RHQE+0rXzTCJRF2Na9hjanZdC8a6zWR9AEiTBQaAhJTRt8HJEfQoWc aCYZGFU/VkjrKe+m0XdsQ+ZE7155RDlv89JVmtQ9g7boVvSaE83guJkvSt2pkqMLi9wR e+CLlI6oUtrcHHK8Kq7+50/FFIcHJPHzzf57l6nT3tr2YXTcvS+kuId0VqXgCbAVor7F DZaS916yjh3mjj+IZgaSNqYwwZHRqgAn/gG1hYxGiJezqu+T7ASCKD9iULxhZUiGGOnM sl1g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1MGXFnyA6yzJpuk6bMShDV1Ql298WQp4cHXgbL27B23bZUhAjwJeenBux3zydprw==
X-Received: by with SMTP id o58mr26418744qtc.108.1490030171645; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 10:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] ( []) by with ESMTPSA id r4sm12762716qkl.34.2017. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Mar 2017 10:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <>
Message-Id: <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7C887240-4686-4F71-9388-681B4D88CD20"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 13:16:09 -0400
In-Reply-To: <>
Cc: dnsop <>, Terry Manderson <>
To: Russ Housley <>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WG review of draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 17:17:50 -0000

On Mar 20, 2017, at 1:08 PM, Russ Housley <> wrote:
> There are other processes for adding names to the root zone.  In my opinion, using the special-use TLD registry as a means of putting a name, even one that has a different scope and use case, is an end run around that process.

So it seems to me that your position is not that it's inappropriate for a name to both be registered in the root zone and in the special-use names registry, but rather that two processes would have to be followed in order for this to happen.   Is that a reasonable interpretation of what you have said?

Also, can you talk about what you think the process should be?   Are you saying that this is not a technical use under the MoU, or just that for this particular technical use, a different process is required?