Re: [DNSOP] requesting WGLC for 5011-security-considerations

Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com> Wed, 05 July 2017 17:55 UTC

Return-Path: <msj@nthpermutation.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD5B131552 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 10:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nthpermutation-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xoPIuHL-vWCZ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 10:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22e.google.com (mail-wr0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38C21131445 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 10:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id c11so267112470wrc.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 10:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nthpermutation-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=oNWCTHHBnuA37mnsuldxbejfGeRGMiv7y2vtu8x2BC0=; b=kk5dgXbdDfQ+saF0YrZ19MJw7EyIhtDAGfPFc1XSiK6q3lE2nWgHdaA12R7RqK9EAX 3ikx4vjJ3F2OLdjuKHmCzLqmGhicpiTvHeBx6wTLpObthwcHLXuPC8cECGSk6sWbBsbt Px5YZpPFITy3Zmg+19bwJaU6DubW24/UicRgcvB+TKcJ16nghhq41Qlaun/p4zwAt1ed fTYZlHXOQfYxrFSVo1WvX2ioNqcVFHXL3I07G81p64mUg/z+6QIshHPmctlP9VsN3wF4 8gz0f0fC4cnbJ3Hv/kHar/pK7bdjl2x+Xwq3FXWZybchch/jUYdn+vtgpKil7OXEL5G9 QBHA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=oNWCTHHBnuA37mnsuldxbejfGeRGMiv7y2vtu8x2BC0=; b=XFIi3PGCawCKzRgbIXZ+x93obDMzqCYj5uvoUTVZDQpYT11OD681unenu2x/HJ5Kzd v0YJD0SnEJPmmrFhOnFbIYV5UGDkY1JykzVMu8SkJQWYO29EfgopN/DGux1OvXPhFG3D +o+NpecD/iJ2lQgvxGlhysVTrJccXz7cE2jD+tAIC9CyQOF668Y++et1zn1beebB+Qdt ab4ccUOvpiUGdUZvd5UcyV9gwQ+sbcHmg0YkUwWzIDm3MoSGX7q0FhQ6OJjweuXaYGD/ q7rv+QvaMwsers/JPBAf0dbstEYYL6c47ahctnEdSfdOHA2CZDAWMwz5KX60FrGeebHV ptwQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOz8B/Z12bXcWyyEI4yPn2KO/4B84VvFoKqSzlrw9AtTecQHNk7u k2833KsrDPvQjIL5Ko3RR6URXZh1XuRX
X-Received: by 10.223.136.216 with SMTP id g24mr36990868wrg.199.1499277300889; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 10:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <ybl4luqq05v.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
In-Reply-To: <ybl4luqq05v.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
From: Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 17:54:50 +0000
Message-ID: <CANeU+ZBzP+0REnZf0=_t60oXD_oA1nbYMRGcoFQ221buJb8YBw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>, dnsop@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11491848f0939d055395b202"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/CL6qGlTfxMa8trcRWgktxDcaMAA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] requesting WGLC for 5011-security-considerations
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 17:55:05 -0000

Could you hold off on this for another week? The revised version dropped
last week and I've been on travel and enjoying the holiday and haven't had
a chance to review the changes.   Thanks - Mike

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 13:11 Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>; wrote:

>
> Folks,
>
> We believe that the latest draft-rfc5011-security-considerations
> document is ready for WGLC, and would like the chairs to start that
> process unless anyone thinks it's not ready to go forward.  In
> particular, we believe all outstanding issues with it have been
> resolved.
>
> Objections?
>
> --
> Wes Hardaker
> USC/ISI
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>