IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] A conversational description of sentinel.

"A. Schulze" <sca@andreasschulze.de> Tue, 06 February 2018 08:42 UTC

Return-Path: <sca@andreasschulze.de>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B155C126C19 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 00:42:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=andreasschulze.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fukaY0-kazS0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 00:42:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.somaf.de (mail.somaf.de [IPv6:2001:470:77b3:100::7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 584E8120727 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 00:42:19 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 09:42:15 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=andreasschulze.de; s=ybz; t=1517906536; x=1522906536; bh=L763N53RfZWJKqIWqilglJGr/wqaQ4vcPUjunh6rY1g=; h=Date:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:from:reply-to:subject:date:to:cc:content-type: message-id; b=As8uMpP9AobRGs6d2L1BVIfz542jV0xmlIhdagcQaJ3gI1I0hjcuNVtiP0dsoUy6j 0p67zM4CurQD9N5i3T9sx9q3G5PTo/1Q1JmPJcSWPkj4pbwzLt6zVrouc7Co43pmfU pfS8/ADuGY4gXDRoTrFuIKbDBb3Hj2JYTRyazmYLG1jhRdgvSPNETRPbyLGdQHBBIG R98eK31muFxs3EHL5pQys1bFjLnleOrsXFW5FNhmxO9gVDitduNa4jdkdkHjvMUK52 U8LMDtIDbFyGtt6mxIFeALPJcvI55sa68PxP8P8i3uSj9DiLZmRsU/18Ic8yRsNT/S cMGXzegNEDgag==
Message-ID: <20180206094215.Horde.m4xt1lsOwvQ28hAbN1r_Tg4@andreasschulze.de>
From: "A. Schulze" <sca@andreasschulze.de>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <CAHw9_iKnD4WtTKyof=nm4ChmDZ5mAPqA7a_-m1t_Lauugf4Uow@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1801251505070.5022@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CAHw9_iJ-gwC1ZoWQ3YiJraD3eoUf-9-Ay--rPYzy1zWYUzvYmg@mail.gmail.com> <FDCED4D6-A7CE-465B-8344-CA89753ADF19@vpnc.org> <74C0CA59-6D53-4A60-ACBA-4AF5B51FE3FF@apnic.net> <D5D013D4-1EAD-434B-863A-29CB1BBEF4E4@vpnc.org> <496EFA88-BA70-460B-BFB2-69B2C7BC905D@apnic.net> <4540A279-4A37-4245-AE61-BEE5342E3F72@vpnc.org> <20180202075530.Horde.UWaxe9eenZ7PyxWYFHCFGdN@andreasschulze.de> <e8ac7bd0-26e6-cf97-e2ef-0ead50dc18ce@nic.cz> <88E7D27C-048E-44CB-B317-C892EA603D31@isc.org> <0c2a4a38-49d7-2b46-1ac8-1dda0812e217@nic.cz> <CAHw9_iJ6yL12OaGW5+fm8M3YUkrj46CvC2-ob7Xrc5HEaA_Z1Q@mail.gmail.com> <f9861a96-a930-bd08-7cf5-5c6b003f706e@nic.cz> <24C74B01-FC08-41CD-BB16-FD122F9EB61A@apnic.net> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1802051246230.30577@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <FDFE42D8-B805-4336-A9A5-B81F416B3251@apnic.net> <D07FE583-06F7-436D-97EF-4747B815AD3F@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <D07FE583-06F7-436D-97EF-4747B815AD3F@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"; DelSp="Yes"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/CWZni4NTDksFcrxDQyVdUpti8Eo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] A conversational description of sentinel.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 08:42:23 -0000

Paul Hoffman:

> I think Tony's idea is likely fine, but I also think  
> kskroll-sentinel-is-ta-NNNN is perfectly fine as well.

Yes, "kskroll-sentinel-is-ta-NNNN" is more descriptive and specific.
I also prefer that longer variant.

Andreas

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email