IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Some distinctions and a request - Have some class?

"Patrik Fältström " <paf@frobbit.se> Sat, 04 July 2015 19:06 UTC

Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68971A897D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 12:06:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.961
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.961 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9AeT6NozJM9r for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 12:05:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [85.30.129.185]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B18591A21BC for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 12:05:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.46] (frobbit.cust.teleservice.net [85.30.128.225]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AAF051FF5C; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 21:05:57 +0200 (CEST)
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
To: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 21:05:57 +0200
Message-ID: <ABDEAC07-47FA-4DE9-9541-730ED588879A@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <27B81BB7-B254-40CD-B245-F74C4F395229@gmail.com>
References: <20150704063120.2380.qmail@ary.lan> <017CF015-8A06-40D5-9ECF-B7B7E208C7AF@frobbit.se> <27B81BB7-B254-40CD-B245-F74C4F395229@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_2EB50CD4-5C4A-4B5D-92D1-1EE1F33CFDB7_="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.1r5102)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/CaZDlO3QWwzK_X1JQ6TGsA_k03M>
Cc: bmanning@karoshi.com, dnsop@ietf.org, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Some distinctions and a request - Have some class?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 19:06:01 -0000

On 4 Jul 2015, at 18:29, Suzanne Woolf wrote:

> It seems to me, from long experience of both organizations, that ICANN says what names should and shouldn’t be in the DNS root zone—

Well, I have never seen ICANN saying "definite no" to any string. ICANN only say "no, this string is not to be ok in THIS round of gTLD applications" (as part of the result of the PDP), or "we defer delegation indefinitely".

If you have other data, please let me know.

As a chair of SSAC I am interested... ;-)

   Patrik

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email