Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-mglt-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements

Joe Abley <> Thu, 07 May 2020 19:42 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B313A0CBB for <>; Thu, 7 May 2020 12:42:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k12-4EZ9bW0j for <>; Thu, 7 May 2020 12:42:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF6133A0CD3 for <>; Thu, 7 May 2020 12:42:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id a15so1330972qvt.9 for <>; Thu, 07 May 2020 12:42:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=google; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=STijTRPmmzk7R/amtwQNVCJbIw3RaL14Y6HYoGS8puo=; b=QowLlcwFQy3OrDW6PS7YMH9n+JD5HRBpTLecVpLLh0Wo427AyciKV/3YUmJv6SFkYa 6/jwrlscS4Ylmle4tfCC6MwsvfSG5wmUC4dBNqslmDEfWoGHF796v8ZL8FsJwrsVws1K mUq/Vpafif51ZuDW30F5pNZ64pLL4H4hpkCCE=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=STijTRPmmzk7R/amtwQNVCJbIw3RaL14Y6HYoGS8puo=; b=P23XbnpIl4SkyNe5P0rCrjzgRiAQiIGzJw1usn7HRTB443FZ/NM51Wx+82e+v5O2xp HbFyB90Scp4mRcNoIcnRBTzgNwZ00UXYZ1QMKnPfHx06WYc/8ZcMus2sT3kGICxPQBSl TYpiFESWNaJE1XuFfIR3P44z1uSYpMHfTifJe9MOnvxXg2mwIcw3Xvo84W350nCa+Mde j+nINzRhrSJbvq8LZq9uI01ZrVm7Ph/kTAfUcx+S7tqy4cvJ9kd5QLfIi4ZdO+w5HlVt 1EDfECDtxg9wOazyoMgFgKTq3+d2mvGjpHiUKJI6ZkgO61YFZWEhhaT0Lbr4/7MAsBQC 7sjA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZjzEIYYgJNW5y+zL0JPa44EHzc3uHLoG0IQB5lTvoy0ETDiKbX VTcN1bLFujNzQgYyj5zAZu6yUQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLESKkhG5cA8kqY5xaNEQGLpX98RyYAoYtmRNrFeGYeiGtU5pKCO9VT8y0aBtf21jxs+pvUmw==
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:ef50:: with SMTP id t16mr1777575qvs.16.1588880567415; Thu, 07 May 2020 12:42:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2607:f2c0:e784:c7:8c7c:d5c2:9fae:917b? ([2607:f2c0:e784:c7:8c7c:d5c2:9fae:917b]) by with ESMTPSA id b42sm5378425qta.29.2020. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 07 May 2020 12:42:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Joe Abley <>
Message-Id: <>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0436A343-9403-40B2-A528-BB9F9BA72736"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.\))
Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 15:42:44 -0400
In-Reply-To: <>
Cc: Tim Wicinski <>, dnsop <>, dnsop-chairs <>
To: Daniel Migault <>
References: <> <> <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-mglt-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 19:42:52 -0000

Hi Daniel,

On 7 May 2020, at 15:39, Daniel Migault <> wrote:

> Thanks for putting the reference of that draft. I have always thought that the draft you were mentioning was the one that became RFC7958.

7958 came from draft-jabley-dnssec-trust-anchor, but the confusion is entirely reasonable!

> The current draft mentions that TA should be associated with bootstrapping mechanism and that boostrapping for the root zone should be extended to other TA.


> There are clearly some overlap between the two drafts and I also have the impression the drafts can be merged.
> the following issue has been opened:

Happy to help with that if it's something that the authors/working group decide is useful.

I support adoption of this draft, now that I've read it properly.