Re: [DNSOP] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names-00.txt]

Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> Wed, 04 December 2013 20:53 UTC

Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA401AD935 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:53:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LOd2ORt55lWX for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:53:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-x231.google.com (mail-ie0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B581AE1B6 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:53:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f177.google.com with SMTP id tp5so27639554ieb.36 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 12:53:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hopcount.ca; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=Ny5PQ7zcpVtrGPu4vVnQtjhjhYCltMaxC0g2LMCOUZ8=; b=bzpVHTAx08DMM+IjL+S1ufbACmpyWrUCURQvjU3DGIe08dvw+gkGqtFSVgj4//bVWn ops2cu/hMTrawhRz+VJyw7y+0RFncMdwROZBKFgjJ+/D3MYs1wUhH0TsvS3mdlspCnWz YuiMyT+A1WO8SWtwR32rbs+waMSIr6IYcdUY0=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=Ny5PQ7zcpVtrGPu4vVnQtjhjhYCltMaxC0g2LMCOUZ8=; b=P3/e+DY2SjQDd4AbO9WMLVJfifd8XXnf2zfSYevQJJUQ6s8Uyrb4GNybXVe4xdTauW 3R/qFN/5yAg6c2bwdhRk4/hIy8mH2CO3tJ8YqaXbpmPrk1m5L3J/k4b7eEHjc1DWTjjR FbIY7Tpdmn77aPFAiIfE20cgnJcfps7E4l+bslWualTz6CsxpXq6Nva33yDXYlEbIcTv wYq3LzljwHxM0E2B2kx/HhLnyeFdJKMtZWss12Jo9/S8ktU17RwoVa5QcXksSH04GXdw keclTXwJI73PNAEbXnTv7RLZeDKVEVKY9tIt5+2B308MWmWTiRKtIL/XdE9WOb9ENdSW 97sQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmj+IbOF9Ie8PWFrBU0hAwtiuLctZ/bu2DAOoTXzMS/EEoPAUYNVGLfl2rsayUGvbLh8aYE
X-Received: by 10.50.26.36 with SMTP id i4mr2791693igg.33.1386190386217; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 12:53:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [199.212.90.48] (24-52-234-221.cable.teksavvy.com. [24.52.234.221]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y10sm6234817igl.4.2013.12.04.12.53.05 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Dec 2013 12:53:05 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 15:53:06 -0500
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Message-ID: <36FD85805C804DE09CA1A62E5F17306B@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20131204115629.0cf4fed0@resistor.net>
References: <BF87877A-8989-4AA4-9ED1-52C82E1BC538@nominum.com> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1312011206480.12923@bofh.nohats.ca> <20131202151651.GD16808@mx1.yitter.info> <A12FD3E0-58F6-4490-877F-A9C59405F717@vpnc.org> <6DBBC8339C394DBDAE4FE1F764E02A8D@hopcount.ca> <20131203170825.GA17211@nic.fr> <21D03162-81D1-494A-89A9-41BE89D28A0E@nominum.com> <BB7627E9-8D50-48E5-B809-64AE4D574271@virtualized.org> <20131203221006.GB5689@sources.org> <D3E446D0-F9ED-4671-A1C2-29A15D3DE010@virtualized.org> <20131204094449.GA5492@nic.fr> <9650BF6D-727B-4EF3-B357-7E4E2FDDE0AF@virtualized.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20131204115629.0cf4fed0@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names-00.txt]
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 20:53:12 -0000

On Wednesday 4 December 2013 at 15:01, SM wrote:

> At 09:14 04-12-2013, David Conrad wrote:
> > On the minus side, management of .ARPA is a part of the IANA 
> > functions contract which implies changes will require US DoC NTIA 
> > approval, so I'd agree that there is a potential for delays and ... 
> > non-technical discussion.
> 
> .arpa is an IETF matter.

Per RFC 3172, changes to the ARPA zone are authorised by the IAB.

Per the most recently-awarded IANA Functions Contract, changes to the ARPA zone are not authorised by NTIA. They use a similar workflow to that employed for root zone management, but not identical.


Joe