[DNSOP] Re: [OPS-DIR]Re: Opsdir ietf last call partial review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis-09
Nabeel Cocker <ncocker@redhat.com> Wed, 23 April 2025 03:06 UTC
Return-Path: <ncocker@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32BE1FBB427 for <dnsop@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 20:06:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hW5INASXBmS2 for <dnsop@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 20:06:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BABDF1FBB40F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 20:06:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1745377614; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=K4aHldAE7JGfdwODJ1hcID2V0tQ/LSLaHNy+PlIya/Q=; b=R0UjPfPSR9r2gtKkmMq26D406Wh6IUzL4msX0ihJf1CGdDHkTeECow6eNrVpmhd6r6DioZ sxc7+A+30bpH7l3dBD6k0BnzsjnGLin20h2nE+xTD515QxAK3KMuw2221Y68Ded0jKXrU5 4ReSoPb0RuOewzx7CN9wS9sVqE3kutU=
Received: from mail-pj1-f69.google.com (mail-pj1-f69.google.com [209.85.216.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-632-sAfXgNE4Md2ET3HbYtyjYA-1; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 23:06:52 -0400
X-MC-Unique: sAfXgNE4Md2ET3HbYtyjYA-1
X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: sAfXgNE4Md2ET3HbYtyjYA_1745377612
Received: by mail-pj1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-3032ea03448so6134081a91.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 20:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1745377611; x=1745982411; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=K4aHldAE7JGfdwODJ1hcID2V0tQ/LSLaHNy+PlIya/Q=; b=oCZs4S6lQPYAuR0lmw5g+8DA6AuVRxZq+GpbVljDMzvOej2DiFeFAoz4nNU5twSAu0 r/mgk+N1Vv3FhSPSGXMQVfolNaC9RXHDm0h/VGFWbvsqZoCMej03GOj2TJ1yW1WuHsQ9 OF43U0m21WZAnj1mHh72Fjdt9OzhmozgMGUPEBInQ04jlQrHCLbsyL9MY8RsAEH/SG4J H5189SHCfS1RR7/g+O3IgLbOQjGgJptC+KbGq28sG/x9xpdZAafoT3PXQNXfPqIjspGA EmZtgAhoYZ9R5M4NLDPjlwZv0i0Ok0pLtDQdjH2pfW76pyn7A5uBGsOxy2jlVI5+gnWf hkIA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCX1ak+1AY045JeUhz+6pLuU3U5D53tpC2wNE4RwUQeCd5IYuOsYrP9IYXklOgth+qYxBNHibg==@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyBVGO2zmo0R70Mmu3WwTIiRYWMC/3w1kJs5WjpEw09YMQ23JXg e9kagQqEXrV1PDc0j7qVYyWxZqykL7v1fPKsL5vcDLdq4YJu+N7B12RnRJwDUGBPMoxWQ6Rp0QI GKJ0ANQLWNn7EEQd8Tm7D0MeUC9uAUjwqnYjFd7JKJIVNxzYfWfi8ErWHE4KrimFuAVkturXxl3 ylTeq4FA/GaPfTt1u1cg==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvm0gcG+sC8eCTMHQPcpK2yJ6YSL13ywx4LZl2UJpJLugRlLGO5+Hp0wzWIQ8W 43vrUKiWn03D5IJVZE5k2e4blQTDes859kTum+SzCcSIFy1NZR8OLYsbtQN8nvx4EqgZ1SEdLzQ ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:524c:b0:2ff:796b:4d05 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-3087bb53f37mr27891343a91.11.1745377611573; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 20:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF7Q6bUB+0hgiqvbW6tyQmvXvzWe7bKlOFZAMv3eBP9Klvhz0wICthG+lWXuaRFDMaA9wtAiyzyhXflV4KPPnI=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:524c:b0:2ff:796b:4d05 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-3087bb53f37mr27891318a91.11.1745377611220; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 20:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <174465840535.1140913.7319759953755231962@dt-datatracker-64c5c9b5f9-hz6qg> <yblh62g5dlp.fsf@wd.hardakers.net>
In-Reply-To: <yblh62g5dlp.fsf@wd.hardakers.net>
From: Nabeel Cocker <ncocker@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 23:06:40 -0400
X-Gm-Features: ATxdqUHkhNHL9QZRArWkv-Idljl4eF4tqSAT_n3dvcWieVI01Jn9laznVIctBSA
Message-ID: <CAGeZtuF0euCKDKtRcfpoozv7T6qCBZoy0N-_hQiqxCekRXaK8A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: ht6QN_9h5Zv7pOcACGzqcU7HcOlRbK7nP_kJvhLfvLw_1745377612
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008436cb063369644f"
Message-ID-Hash: YCRJDBHANULEJGZE2VSHDH27HL2QQYDK
X-Message-ID-Hash: YCRJDBHANULEJGZE2VSHDH27HL2QQYDK
X-MailFrom: ncocker@redhat.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Nabeel Cocker via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>, ops-dir@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: [OPS-DIR]Re: Opsdir ietf last call partial review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis-09
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Ci6mf46OP62ls9lixQPye4D68dc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>
Hello Wes, Your updates totally work! thanks for the updates! Regards, Nabeel On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 1:08 PM Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> wrote: > Nabeel Cocker via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> writes: > > Hi Nabeel, > > > Section 1.2, paragraph 3: > > ========================== > > "This will allow for deprecated algorithms to become used less and less > over > > time." > > > > Perhaps say it like "This ensures that the use of deprecated algorithms > > decreases over time." > > Done! > > > > Section 2: > > =========== > > The last paragraph states > > The "Implement for" column values are transcribed from > > [RFC8624]. The "Use for" columns are set to the same values as the > > "implement for" ... > > "implement for" has a lower case "i". > > Good catch, thanks. > > > Section 2: > > ---------- > > The last paragraph states: > > The "Implement for" column values are transcribed from > > [RFC8624]. The "Use for" columns are set to the same values as the > > "implement for" values since the general interpretation to date > > indicates they have been treated as values for both "implementation" > > and "use". We note that the values for "Implement for" and "Use for" > > may diverge in the future. > > > > The above text indicates that the "Implement for" and "Use for" columns > should > > have identical values. However, when I look at Table 2, there are > differences > > between the values in the "Implement for" and the "Use for" for number > 5, 7, 8, > > 10 and 13, For example, in number 5 where Use for DNSSEC Validation is > > "RECOMMEND" but the Implement for DNSSEC Validation is "MUST" > > That's a good point and we don't discuss it in the document. The WG > wished to not use MUST and MUST-NOT for the Use for column, so we > replaced them with RECOMMENDED. As such, I added a sentence to the > document that now says: > > Note that the "Use for" columns values use "RECOMMENDED" when the > corresponding "Implement for" column is a "MUST" value. > > Does that work for you? > -- > Wes Hardaker > USC/ISI > > _______________________________________________ > OPS-DIR mailing list -- ops-dir@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to ops-dir-leave@ietf.org > -- *Nabeel Cocker* Senior Principal Architect, Global Telco Consulting Practice M: +1-845-240-2587 Email: ncocker@redhat.com <https://www.redhat.com/>
- [DNSOP] Opsdir ietf last call partial review of d… Nabeel Cocker via Datatracker
- [DNSOP] Re: Opsdir ietf last call partial review … Wes Hardaker
- [DNSOP] Re: [OPS-DIR]Re: Opsdir ietf last call pa… Nabeel Cocker
- [DNSOP] Re: [OPS-DIR]Re: Opsdir ietf last call pa… Nabeel Cocker
- [DNSOP] Re: [OPS-DIR]Re: Opsdir ietf last call pa… Wes Hardaker