Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoptions: draft-lhotka-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Tue, 16 July 2019 10:25 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CEE21200B2 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 03:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mrRJdPu9mp80 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 03:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DFBF120048 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 03:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:45588) by ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.137]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1hnKdy-001kX5-LY (Exim 4.92) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Tue, 16 Jul 2019 11:25:10 +0100
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 11:25:10 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Matthijs Mekking <matthijs@pletterpet.nl>
cc: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <ac31455a-e66e-be04-f4d6-6411e896e589@pletterpet.nl>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1907161124280.8471@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <820fe3a1-9d54-15c1-8194-8a607bdf6a31@NLnetLabs.nl> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1907151726520.15898@bofh.nohats.ca> <CADyWQ+Gt7WUjOFP8dMELT+UQLdvPBcMXA4UX2xtZiqtp0zP9nQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJhMdTNofj4-wjKY1u2B5UhbhbcHYOvr_-V2bfuMK+d9SjHgsA@mail.gmail.com> <ac31455a-e66e-be04-f4d6-6411e896e589@pletterpet.nl>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/CjlF7vskeE6vdLWwYRlXolEJc_Y>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoptions: draft-lhotka-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 10:25:15 -0000

Matthijs Mekking <matthijs@pletterpet.nl> wrote:
>
> The status of A6 in this draft is set to obsolete, as it should be. But
> what should the status of DLV be in this document? This question I guess
> proves Paul's argument that putting snapshots of IANA registries in an
> I-D is a bad idea.

Right, this yang draft should not mention any of these things directly.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
North Utsire, South Utsire: Northerly 4 or 5, occasionally 6 at first.
Moderate becoming slight. Fair. Good.