Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Action: draft-chapin-additional-reserved-tlds-00.txt

Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster@mykolab.com> Tue, 04 February 2014 15:17 UTC

Return-Path: <fergdawgster@mykolab.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968381A010A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 07:17:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.135
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.135 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P-cu9Qv1GnrY for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 07:17:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx05.mykolab.com (mx01.mykolab.com [95.128.36.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 249E81A016B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 07:17:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at kolabsys.net
Sender: fergdawgster@mykolab.com
Message-ID: <52F10481.4000700@mykolab.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 07:17:21 -0800
From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster@mykolab.com>
Organization: Clowns R. Mofos
To: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
References: <20140204063911.55905.qmail@joyce.lan> <AACA56B2-52E6-416A-9CAF-CB7A7BE1ECC8@hopcount.ca> <52F1008A.4030502@redbarn.org>
In-Reply-To: <52F1008A.4030502@redbarn.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Action: draft-chapin-additional-reserved-tlds-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: fergdawgster@mykolab.com
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 15:17:33 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2/4/2014 7:00 AM, Paul Vixie wrote:

> 
> Joe Abley wrote:
>>> ...
>>> 
>>> ONION is like LOCAL. Neither are like ARPA (or any other TLD).
> How like LOCAL is ONION? ICANN knows it can't sell .LOCAL, but
> does ICANN know it can't sell .ONION ?

I think I see where Vixie is going with this, and I concur. I don't
see the difference either, and simply because .onion started being
used before a contrarian policy was in place should not be reason
enough to dispense with it's use.

$.02,

- - ferg


- -- 
Paul Ferguson
VP Threat Intelligence, IID
PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iF4EAREIAAYFAlLxBIEACgkQKJasdVTchbKLwQEAhXCQ/3EcUjZRtjyFkD+WirA4
0N+jWQlKEIdY43ZlQuIA/2XGqEJxRPhQxF0nMPK/brMnliaD14d0jgr0BY6U6EHC
=VrNq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----