IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-wkumari-dnsop-alt-tld-00.txt

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Wed, 12 February 2014 16:14 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E861A09C0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:14:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yWVF6rIBwmj6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:14:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 389F51A09D0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:14:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 70C7928015A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:14:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay1.nic.fr (relay1.nic.fr [192.134.4.162]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CE26280102 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:14:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:8::7:113]) by relay1.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A9B24C0053 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:13:49 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:13:49 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20140212161349.GA31661@nic.fr>
References: <20140210205838.15973.63281.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140210205838.15973.63281.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 7.3
X-Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-wkumari-dnsop-alt-tld-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:14:24 -0000

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:58:38PM -0800,
 internet-drafts@ietf.org <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote 
 a message of 36 lines which said:

>         Title           : The ALT Special Use Top Level Domain
>         Authors         : Warren Kumari
>                           Andrew Sullivan
> 	Filename        : draft-wkumari-dnsop-alt-tld-00.txt

The goal is laudable and I like the end of section 3, acknoweledging
that, existing TLDs like .onion won't move to the new .ALT

However, I disagree with the terminology.

> DNS context: The namespace administered by ICANN.

No. The DNS is a protocol. It exists whether or not it is rooted at
ICANN. When you use an "alternative root" (RFC 2826), you use the
DNS. When a big closed organization has its own infrastructure, with
root servers and so on, it is still the same DNS protocol.

> the DNS "standard" of a series of labels separated with dots

Many other systems work with this syntax (domain names can be resolved
by other protocols than the DNS, for instance /etc/hosts or LDAP) so
it should not be called "DNS standard".

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status