IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Doh] Alternate proposal for transport indication in draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-wireformat-http

Davey Song <songlinjian@gmail.com> Wed, 04 April 2018 02:15 UTC

Return-Path: <songlinjian@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20080127735; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 19:15:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y9NzaU3Eg9OA; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 19:15:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22f.google.com (mail-vk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ADA61243FE; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 19:15:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id h134so11475811vke.2; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 19:15:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=F+nSoLytIB97BVpO+eqmQkm0PIMjXzBySqbcBLC9FAo=; b=E1OJ8jCuWYr9nuIIgoMXlqQnPSSPUWE7W1GxGaj3p0VVViP8es8yCXK7cCowJ0DTPj dxCryFIqMFV2Fb/DklWCzxXZO75O5bsjhBF9eMRt/zCbgBxSoaR+CPKNoGxz9YoOujyG fXPNuluXnh3G7EbRZrxzU7rjFByIJCDpktanct+sUffgmn5eCK9hOXts2a23ZcaB7dfa vW/KAzZ48J137NJnOdpjWKX8CMNN816hk81eB8yggrdD2oPg6n6JeYghQfgV6wnOVBJm 69RR/zVhztc9ITYJwe5A7xSMbgBp246Bx2K6UZ9y+YNe8MUu3NZuBTaSqofk43bV0CWs NzwQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=F+nSoLytIB97BVpO+eqmQkm0PIMjXzBySqbcBLC9FAo=; b=A58CKvqzKlkR8btAigsD15YKT5QyUoQ/mbTHtQfGBIHooUtGvEON8/L+BweffV6EoF g1M/Mgpmu6EdQsGWZghrtBN1CVey7beS8oYPeq7Mm54O2dqw86M3qAc5y1y39WKA/Uiu fW6G3N0TjFu8Aavu6TXB5c4YGcvfy9prpcpRHEGmnHe93Nm7QbNXfq65lsXy6+xppgqk HFgdvf7efR/a/NubnfcfMeKEXzCIMCAUiuQ7nlOtaKe9BN0jBk6MmhKn2F1UCljFwTaj M5fbLsaQfJL2GfFOG8hQYsBpzF3bCI4TqlpaJnMtp2BBuYxOkjaHhtgWf9i+8roHvCr5 Bmug==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tAyO6Y1ZZxckS+dtAbNfogF/l6M/HoLyZ8uEuYzmMhKprQf/YXC ElA4YQaW5byNp1bAO4UiNrAon5BSIpEJ9j/cpdw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48HTYGg0l86ns0ln8NkkeuTwqrF1refNOCj/W1eaP93iD1NGbchEb6ygUzg+o+3PBBJ4e67twkGkOolsi16IdI=
X-Received: by 10.31.235.130 with SMTP id j124mr257632vkh.85.1522808148525; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 19:15:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.159.43.143 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 19:15:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnVL0XaUDS-WzDGaN9-kLx9p3x1+UVuWhvx=Zyo5oRos+w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <152168039295.5550.9572034766968749020.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAAObRXLm3c-p9rZkn6H6tcEoh3-UT5JW06NXQ_FMyyr2NFMmyw@mail.gmail.com> <23219.33838.166003.614689@gro.dd.org> <CAAObRX+xF5SwVd3x3iXSWd-A0Kpr_ubbOJzn0yTrSk8pc+tm6Q@mail.gmail.com> <23219.56569.2064.711002@gro.dd.org> <CA+nkc8ANQh2wAr6==eNuM82mbD+E2ELzHGizdqF_sGdY-kkOqg@mail.gmail.com> <5AB3E3B7.3080607@redbarn.org> <69AA6C5D-D348-4956-8A31-FE1EC3A2042E@icann.org> <CABkgnnX2jGY_JpVbqJuQdDVUyVzsuM_2CDg4nppfqQHZQm0F+w@mail.gmail.com> <CAAObRXKHhk51DxNt5uiYB0gunJ=DNde2j9FJSU=Ky2m4Q1UkhQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnVL0XaUDS-WzDGaN9-kLx9p3x1+UVuWhvx=Zyo5oRos+w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Davey Song <songlinjian@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 10:15:47 +0800
Message-ID: <CAAObRXL_aH4==CQhO9_rG1ADGNA26NV_LCRZ9=XCGxRn7SGhvA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c094060c10a0c0568fc6667"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/CmsL-0RshJS7KgT4_CC1Hjmje4A>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Doh] Alternate proposal for transport indication in draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-wireformat-http
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 02:15:51 -0000

On 3 April 2018 at 17:58, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:

> If I understand your response (not sure that I do), that seems pretty
> academic and not at all persuasive.  For instance, if a client cared
> about testing TCP capabilities, it can always do its own resolution.


It's not the emphasis. Peopole get tied of misbehavior (or unexperect
behavior) of all kinds of middlebox. I just think DOH proxy should not add
any fuel on that.

Davey

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email