Re: [DNSOP] attrleaf

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Tue, 28 March 2017 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEFD91293FC for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:46:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fUpa-2Nqt-Nb for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:46:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEEB91293E8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:46:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:559:8000:c9:50e4:c235:dee1:8442] (unknown [IPv6:2001:559:8000:c9:50e4:c235:dee1:8442]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB32C61F9C; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 17:46:38 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <58DAA17D.80504@redbarn.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:46:37 -0700
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.12 (Windows/20170323)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
CC: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <58DA9747.1070405@redbarn.org> <2ec2593d-c5a7-7f0b-c9fb-bcb1fa2d5073@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <2ec2593d-c5a7-7f0b-c9fb-bcb1fa2d5073@dcrocker.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/CoAwtaesfqIXXx5fVoaDTkaaWQM>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] attrleaf
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 17:46:40 -0000


Dave Crocker wrote:
> There is already massive use of underscore names.
> 
> Deep aesthetic pain notwithstanding, there hasn't been a groundswell of
> operational complaints that would be needed to reverse this many years
> and such widespread use of the convention.

i don't think it's wise to estimate damage by observed complain level.
if _ is now in world wide use for all kinds of stuff, you can still say
that SRV got it wrong, and that the recommended way to do this kind of
thing is different from what SRV did. you could also do what a lot of
operating system developers had to do about _ use with C, which is use
two underscores in the next design, whose use will be better policed.

-- 
P Vixie