IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Sat, 11 April 2020 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <stephane@sources.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826593A14FD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 09:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.652
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.652 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IMi-hoLnimwI for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 09:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ayla.bortzmeyer.org (ayla.bortzmeyer.org [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc0:41:216:3eff:fe27:3d3f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 560143A14FA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 09:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ayla.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 60EA9A0277; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 18:38:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail.sources.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A3331CAE6A; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 18:34:02 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 18:34:02 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com>
Cc: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>, "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20200411163402.GA16602@sources.org>
References: <CAHPuVdV9eSCLQOqMF0cq8fHcuSZs7nCgjhHMfMoaV5H=ekbtSA@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCiqcdQCDs0gY=+zJdkfLx4+mbEAzSZp1hPJuyM5U0KTAiQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHPuVdUjsC62TK-4WeaL-TWgBpz_qk7mQb=JqGQd5U_djXNA3Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHPuVdUjsC62TK-4WeaL-TWgBpz_qk7mQb=JqGQd5U_djXNA3Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 10.3
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/CqZFfUM5iGY3HKvSB7dr0VskcEU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 16:38:15 -0000

On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 09:22:42AM -0400,
 Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com> wrote 
 a message of 138 lines which said:

> I've heard proposals in the past that TLDs should routinely scan all
> their delegations to identify such problems, but I gather this is a
> challenging requirement to impose on them for various reasons.

Also, delegation is not only done by TLDs. The problem, already huge
with only the TLDs, would be even worse with all the delegating
domains.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email