From nobody Wed Nov 4 14:06:30 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02CD63A1057 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 14:06:29 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.897 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=depht-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5h8RkRtP-sUh for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 14:06:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qt1-x829.google.com (mail-qt1-x829.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::829]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF2503A104E for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 14:06:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qt1-x829.google.com with SMTP id r8so111646qtp.13 for ; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 14:06:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=depht-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version; bh=vum6nrC3Xq/oKcz2e1R9XCcLw/LYZYvXlwakivqw7V8=; b=TPSySUIQBaGWrexiYI/hJc5BA7SdP32RL9XfOeLWbHYXEBxSzVXqQiVzTetkYc7Ur0 YJVxkB6RFNpH5uWHg/rZGsFD6ZFG2fCPNa7a5XHiKdJSoCVvRKmX7nQnSDQvKACP5VuD f61z/aazT+nVVU0vd92wyCHgu817SxF3Uon6lKv+BlMCdDf1LvwOxiwJ/dVy944BQ7eL gf9yZTGYqA68qmIQk+5aTaTC9Tr9HjQlsVkEUVjxVKzcFBV/IIQbL5ebQ5G5/0vVoDtM YrPmtSGjk88NDlf9R8vWh3vNYrtrk3RUR1rlQPFIMipb0it/hlLd3XuFUpU9yDBtwV5Z nowQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version; bh=vum6nrC3Xq/oKcz2e1R9XCcLw/LYZYvXlwakivqw7V8=; b=lQt2al08GLsTXemQeJyED64ld1ioFJaXdr+uzwOTH0bLqbWwNjuCobpyCJoy2aSysK VXcPnbUDTiqooYIFrweStZstLP5DyB72Lfh7R62ABgG/F0Xi8sYHoisYu8emCn45AoRt NrY9RWZF9bFOUt/XKnxVZlWx0OQ4hMUEyAwaXwliUMEEKf5apSxaQUHhlS40KKAJvMj2 t2MIcO/91QZAEXVWrMIS7U9qGeRtmvSMGREjWiGNs+gBfmSiRtzSmsbkZefR/iAqynSJ 6T6UgAQZT0pJl5GWh5nxsqdUiiMoGQoxK2r2v4c6//7BmKl4SHODcWZcyBThvi8P6AbX LB2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531PlPdIB0RFgNnvV6WXP22FYlt+RwK+3dgXpK5TTZV/vIffVpO6 f67GoRCtN9tR3yED1mlri/YVVnCHp+cfIA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxwS0jP5lVA2Sy6qDx4zWJ0HUnxlbcXHxhTm3cTVNX+AFsTPn220AA0Trq2ayroIvQDokwpsQ== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7686:: with SMTP id g6mr182946qtr.125.1604527586623; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 14:06:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.47.61.38] ([2a02:a212:9285:29f0:6020:ca8e:d7f:5408]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f21sm3210104qkl.131.2020.11.04.14.06.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Nov 2020 14:06:26 -0800 (PST) From: "Andrew McConachie" To: "Wes Hardaker" Cc: dnsop@ietf.org Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 23:06:24 +0100 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.2r5673) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <731ACFB4-74AF-442C-A22B-D3FA2FF49DA1@depht.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Archived-At: Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-hardaker-dnsop-private-namespace-options X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 22:06:29 -0000 On 4 Nov 2020, at 17:47, Wes Hardaker wrote: > "Andrew McConachie" writes: > >> 1. Is a special-use domain per [RFC6761], and does not (and will >> never) exist in the GID. >> In this document, we refer to this as ".internal" for discussion >> purposes only following >> conventions in [draft-wkumari-dnsop-internal]. >> >> I read the above text as telling me that .internal will never exist >> in >> the GID. > > Ahh... thanks for the precise reference. > > Yes, those two bullets are backwards in their examples. Ugh. > .internal > and .zz should be switched there. > > (fixed in the source) Thanks Wes. That makes sense.