Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-arends-private-use-tld

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse <[e-mail]>]

John,

technically ICANN is only really in charge of the gTLD name space as the
ccTLD one depends on the ISO 2 letter alpha code elements over which
ICANN has no control.

el

On 2020-06-14 02:03 , John Levine wrote:
> In article <[e-mail]> you write:
>> This is likely to be a Fine Proposal, worthy of serious
>> consideration, but the venue where such topics should be considered
>> is elsewhere, in my view.  I realise that explicitly opposing such WG
>> calls for adoption is tantamount to heresy in today’s IETF, but
>> nevertheless I must record my opposition to adoption.
>
> Agreed.  The proposal is technically fine but for better or worse,
> ICANN is in charge of the TLD namespace these days.
>
> If something else like .onion that has a technical aspect comes along,
> we can probably deal with that, with ICANN's tacit cooperation, but I
> wouldn't push it.
>
> R's,
> JOhn
[...]

-- 
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse   \         /       Obstetrician & Gynaecologist
[e-mail]             / *      |  Telephone: [phone] (cell)
PO Box 8421 Bachbrecht  \      /  If this email is signed with GPG/PGP
10007, Namibia           ;____/ Sect 20 of Act No. 4 of 2019 may apply