Re: [DNSOP] Minimum viable ANAME

Matthijs Mekking <matthijs@pletterpet.nl> Tue, 26 March 2019 15:36 UTC

Return-Path: <matthijs@pletterpet.nl>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1B2120482 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 08:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QLYiSEfd-1L7 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 08:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lb1-smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net (lb1-smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net [194.109.24.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C138C12046D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 08:36:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:67c:1232:144:ec78:3fe3:33d4:593e] ([IPv6:2001:67c:1232:144:ec78:3fe3:33d4:593e]) by smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net with ESMTPA id 8o86hpsvxNG8z8o8AhYZ5n; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 16:36:50 +0100
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
References: <20180919201401.8E0C220051382A@ary.qy> <08C8A740-D09B-4577-AF2A-79225EDB526B@dotat.at> <20180920061343.GA754@jurassic> <E944887D-51ED-41A0-AC5A-3076743620D8@isoc.org> <acef1f69-8e4f-52cc-dca5-3ada9446e0ee@bellis.me.uk> <CABrJZ5HmCoSsGe2L-JkAsPywhcxyyVkvMmXCvQyJMjWHnMeT_w@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1903261521290.13313@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
From: Matthijs Mekking <matthijs@pletterpet.nl>
Message-ID: <104ec4ea-296f-1657-5633-f6c1f2684274@pletterpet.nl>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 16:36:46 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1903261521290.13313@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfKAOvIk9uiebJgbKaSyHnWZZP1YHmc4IhH2lQDmJfU8ztL2aesrBx4m9zZRrX40+jR3YTo4x9Thnc08NuGPA/EujSmwJKqEklIW7uSP4ltF6ttIm34s7 /Sup/3snGGMzz6lksDpSW2Z8AATKkDhV1nvOIj8x7badEHmQuVDbxHyJHKfuZmZhYXwFT3QGt//SGGMfCIXiNoO8wCW0tCZV/Vuc+1DpqtdDQQOmV+cITquu TRVDbnoAq2rIlGbxaSvWdNvvEpOQEYKsBN4gaVqoyJUxpUv8A24H05/PY0iC1dkx
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/D4-r2HKLhoofmPCd3sJPwopYbAc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Minimum viable ANAME
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 15:36:59 -0000

Hi Tony,

On 3/26/19 4:32 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
> I'm overloaded at the moment so I wasn't able to rev the draft in time for
> IETF 104. I was planning to (basically) re-focus on the meaning of the
> bits on the wire, and remove any requirements about how zone contents are
> provisioned. Instead there would be a series of examples of existing
> ANAME-like systems.

I think that would be the wrong direction.  I believe there is a need to 
standardize the ANAME resolution process and so my suggestion would be 
to reduce the scope by focusing just on how to do that on the 
provisioning side (and leave secondary servers and resolvers out of 
scope for now).

Matthijs

> 
> Tony.
>