[DNSOP] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec-04: (with COMMENT)
Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 09 April 2020 13:22 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E09F73A0AF4; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 06:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec@ietf.org, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org, Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>, benno@NLnetLabs.nl
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.125.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <158643857890.8626.13985072035811926081@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 06:22:58 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/DJ_8eGrMzpzLnoTVqL6qgSm52lw>
Subject: [DNSOP] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 13:22:59 -0000
Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- My lack of domain knowledge made this document hard for me to understand, but given that this document as aimed at folks deploying DNS servers I don't really see that as a problem. One note is that the draft does use quite a few acronyms and has no terminology section. I'm not suggesting adding a terminology section but perhaps in the introduction it would be worth adding a sentence to point readers to RFC 8499/BCP 219? This should probably also be listed as an informative dependency (assuming that the terms used are formally defined elsewhere).
- [DNSOP] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-iet… Robert Wilton via Datatracker
- Re: [DNSOP] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft… Shumon Huque