IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: primary, secondary, master, slave

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Fri, 01 May 2015 18:32 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD69C1A911F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 May 2015 11:32:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6yBWKNs0Wr_7 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 May 2015 11:32:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 234531A8A7C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 May 2015 11:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.101] (50-1-98-218.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.98.218]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t41IVkl2093306 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 1 May 2015 11:31:47 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: proper.com: Host 50-1-98-218.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.98.218] claimed to be [10.20.30.101]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAHPuVdWjbu0j9S30twWzy=mFHp8zmnar0nSVvcpzROodE_-q1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 11:31:46 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6B1A8FA6-01D5-4848-A60B-6E9443613871@vpnc.org>
References: <B261195B-7592-4B67-94E6-9741E853AD4A@vpnc.org> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1505011140530.23307@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CAHPuVdWjbu0j9S30twWzy=mFHp8zmnar0nSVvcpzROodE_-q1w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com>, Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/DKiEgDh9IOOCqAO5v25UPJTsYt8>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: primary, secondary, master, slave
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 18:32:02 -0000

Are y'all looking at the -01 draft? Because it defines "primary server" and "primary master", both using quotes from RFCs. Are those quotes not correct?

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email