IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Thu, 06 July 2017 21:52 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 869A7126B7F; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 14:52:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SWzmPiCsgN1O; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 14:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [199.6.1.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25383124217; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 14:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97DB924AE0D; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 21:52:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 509F9160047; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 21:52:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110C4160098; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 21:52:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id qOdQSm_dyZ_F; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 21:52:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (c27-253-115-14.carlnfd2.nsw.optusnet.com.au [27.253.115.14]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8262B160047; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 21:52:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rock.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A8C7DB2FBA; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 07:52:36 +1000 (AEST)
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>, IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <m2podgxq97.wl-randy@psg.com> <5F120298-CD66-4CB6-9DC5-0C5DF6F02CC7@fugue.com> <CACfw2hhx+-Z=7ZnnaOkToc+Bd7aKDpBFt+nFUxkt9sKqLn4D8Q@mail.gmail.com> <2DF1AFC7-643B-4610-8EB8-0616D3D0B024@fugue.com> <595BD53E.60701@redbarn.org> <E739C1CB-E60E-4B4B-99CF-1E6C68CB6926@rfc1035.com> <7DCA3DAF1993A2E66915D0DD@JcK-HP5.jck.com> <595BE0D5.5000106@redbarn.org> <CAMm+Lwjd6xVp-EDp=doevx=AP8qws_Mv++aL733yHEyUF72EMA@mail.gmail.com> <562EC659F89FA92A09CAC4DB@PSB> <20170706153955.GB3393@localhost>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 06 Jul 2017 10:39:56 -0500." <20170706153955.GB3393@localhost>
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 07:52:36 +1000
Message-Id: <20170706215236.99A8C7DB2FBA@rock.dv.isc.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/DMOqcNztZhDq51_WEWk4eC9Ymlg>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 21:52:46 -0000

In message <20170706153955.GB3393@localhost>, Nico Williams writes:
> So new classes will only be useful to extend the IN-class RR type
> namespace.  We won't get there.  New RR types can be very difficult to
> deploy due to lack of interest by registrars and domain hosting
> services.  TXT RRs forever.  :(

Or you could stop trying to reinforce the myth that new RR types
are hard to deploy.  They really aren't.  They actually get used
all the time.

> Cheers,
> 
> Nico
> -- 
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email