IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] DNSOPI-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-02.txt

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Fri, 26 November 2021 19:13 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C413A0BA2 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 11:13:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.952
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.952 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.852, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redbarn.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TvmJ4AU-9KJo for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 11:13:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from util.redbarn.org (util.redbarn.org [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D77453A0B9C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 11:13:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by util.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F221B1B2425; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 19:13:12 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=redbarn.org; s=util; t=1637953992; bh=1aeEwg/J9DpeAMqh/ST6VyD2Xrz3tQ7Mum1yZTgNRcI=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=lfCUAr1KM2tI5jpV2Z/fgReTsSrbQsdSe+FFga5ZYAACmGfcZhovMy1GXVx5P73JA x+QsXs/4Wjyf3GCl9i3qzunT+ATKYEOnOfWBtPRPDnupeFyx6Bm+fcVfJD3+zu1E93 37sbGXwufz43o5sf4teSaM6LmU1o0JyB3gdGgb5U=
Received: from [IPv6:2001:559:8000:c9:6087:2ccf:f283:6a7f] (unknown [IPv6:2001:559:8000:c9:6087:2ccf:f283:6a7f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BFD5A7597E; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 19:13:12 +0000 (UTC)
To: Petr Špaček <pspacek@isc.org>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <163777315136.16773.10633006296842101587@ietfa.amsl.com> <yblh7c1fpwf.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <914ced6b-52c7-9354-4b91-87f80cd26037@pletterpet.nl> <6153c0ed-523a-5225-40ac-5be9fd5e6ed5@isc.org> <92dde682-7b1b-9fa3-f469-cb6623dc5ac4@pletterpet.nl> <8f614329-8b75-7c63-7668-e0a45f5b2362@isc.org>
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
Message-ID: <bed09d68-ebdc-10d6-2569-fa481227ec8f@redbarn.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 11:13:13 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/7.0.52
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8f614329-8b75-7c63-7668-e0a45f5b2362@isc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/DPsD2vfjNMVfp5mSq-SxfMF2icE>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSOPI-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 19:13:25 -0000


Petr Špaček wrote on 2021-11-26 01:24:
> ...
> 
> Maybe your proposed text can be prepended/appended to the current 
> content of 3.2.  Recommendation for validating resolvers, so we can keep 
> the "vendors are encouraged to continue evaluating NSEC3 iteration count 
> deployments" part?

if we must say this, s/vendors/implementers/, please. some of us when we 
play with dns or dnssec don't share our resulting code. --vixie

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status