IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] FYI: WG adoption of DNS binding in ADD

Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com> Mon, 27 September 2021 23:06 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E933A0FE1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 16:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DSvVaF09wsM2 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 16:06:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x135.google.com (mail-lf1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 083083A0FDE for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 16:06:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x135.google.com with SMTP id z24so85262060lfu.13 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 16:06:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=TV+gb5Eehd4a1vuRbCX5wt1o0tuN+PrC+2/O63RsKTg=; b=CVyPhFIPd0kmcEmi6cPlPhbYN6RnYZ9vkGJXG3lK79Jr/GkYyYhpQ+ZA2gj14H132V C2y8htPJ1fKmjv3tCvDwcxW17gHO1SJfQpJfts7xQn0kvpZy3VgTVo7ybwJ2vKaCQ6UR DKj/TXS2ZEk+DXp1cRQiONeN6Ic2jluHjjgjARqQA2BmGUM81w0TfT2+BluwMOHgdOI6 gEfxO8mqc/F981lXhWZlLtta/gtF9b8m8I1Yo9rY8pTWJFBOLqGTFb0cxMW0X0AGLkbA lVvQEXQwvKIfRAVmjucP3NJXZ9ujwKjajYH8Or6JPc+41XJzSRydrhvfC+WvhR5DQLBi 7IIw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=TV+gb5Eehd4a1vuRbCX5wt1o0tuN+PrC+2/O63RsKTg=; b=T+gUF2jFI45oUj+WGdtmKlrQAxZhaRSSHi2Cj4H53NQUJaJg2G/9D3vmNEuvZ1nUx9 5Cw6H3jktv3MKAVaNwhaF0eOa2JUT9DH3mi3NQG0KkzX0VWnngNbk9uUN6S33QfOVvrS Xe0hc5bRKi1RBc+xurHEXwF8LlJoKny5HuaXtN+sN8OX3azWjMHsUFaY7wr3e6f12NFg V6N1e83NlJ+WH8ra1BACP+KiqMvP5W8D1g1HzDl3j4Kr7IrHOOcuhaRvc71uNFsDxpeD BvgsQWjtPWZPjYy/SJ5exEcLwyH17V3Ls0LbcKoQm4Jl1rADsuInIBJLY88/uooNmVeJ VzbA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532JQFpAbkbq0F367COblpXK8FiUTKOrILGq0MDJGp/0lHXg1oEA j/jjrEa5WIb6R4i4POSBIjjqBTPEy2kdaWN8k/Xu+rhA
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwje/5oM8pecy8bLq0oD5VcdS3TOfiCzLhtaUUfT/WRHM1Gt6QyMlmNgCe+LOHjDbjDaAkYP504bT+WSCdcbSA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:311:: with SMTP id a17mr2455085ljp.293.1632783966972; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 16:06:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAH1iCiqw=qBAzta0rzN3UfMNL4jZwieps9zTUqDfTqBF+HXFwg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH1iCiqw=qBAzta0rzN3UfMNL4jZwieps9zTUqDfTqBF+HXFwg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 16:05:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CAH1iCiqU=Wpe8uq4LA6FBnjjkn1=7P+4ccrD+axU35C50b_ENg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000058af0705cd0224fc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/DQsKv5e-PDZfEstRMRbbnY8cMkY>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] FYI: WG adoption of DNS binding in ADD
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 23:06:12 -0000

Sorry folks, I misread the draft that is in WG adopt request state.

The name on it, and the terminology used in it, mislead me to thinking it
was specifically for authoritative servers, rather than resolvers.
(It is about the latter, but worded and named as if it could apply to
authoritative servers. I'm not at all convinced it would be useful or a
good alignment of use cases.)

I think it SHOULD be limited in scope to recursives, in which case it would
belong in ADD. (But that is a hard IF and ONLY IF, IMNSHO).

Brian

On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 2:18 PM Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> In case anyone does not follow the ADD WG, or does not closely follow
> DPRIVE, there is a WG adoption call for an SVCB binding for DNS.
>
> There are two days left in that adoption call.
>
> I encourage folks to take a look and give feedback concerning where they
> think any such draft belongs (e.g. DNSOP in stead), plus on the draft's
> readiness and suitability.
>
> (My opinion is that there are use cases beyond those in ADD, and the right
> place to address the possibly conflicting requirements is DNSOP, and that
> the ADD WG should not adopt it.)
>
> Brian
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email