IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] ALT-TLD and (insecure) delgations.

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 06 February 2017 04:22 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AEA1129B43 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Feb 2017 20:22:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xyJk2v6T98WA for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Feb 2017 20:22:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x229.google.com (mail-lf0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60F07129B39 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Feb 2017 20:22:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf0-x229.google.com with SMTP id v186so37983800lfa.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 05 Feb 2017 20:22:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SWLqIdmODMv9b7MZdSymrwG+jFv5loLJPay5/1BewL0=; b=cnbTJmiWkURMfdvsGBhWoa3NLFweXTTAc/vMnp+JwX1jfseNcannCEQwZiTU+3Mn+r wClovgrGbUtCGYZHWU+w0IVRWUw9/D3D2zqrtIXMzKUtT69q4ypC6pWldEfCP4VqEYB4 5bDN/iP7cx+X4SAyJ7Q2TF+fXa1nIMdnj2LhfCxYGgOjLZ3PKyyg1rgLumdTDlIhbIZw /NbbvRtVJMUfcAqoutANUThWtsDzuQt8t+LUKoB/YCBpwmz/6xmK05Z/ZS/tZ3pt9mRm MjgNrOfsXWUCerZR2NtR7jm9UmbM8Pa4Kpu/Y3VKArg/yMwBAPwNTjyVPFPQcI/yCIlu Lfkw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SWLqIdmODMv9b7MZdSymrwG+jFv5loLJPay5/1BewL0=; b=TWI1OGEXtgsa1JqHIsqKyqS+vyZJI3AwXWhI0bF+h75AwTb/f7JQM+vucCjSHhLcR4 2VVbntEwTxCwGgwMNThFrOf2LU5aIWmlwYeUQahQeEJoaNeDUZzkQ4Yzk4+FpqQbURc2 3bJt7Gft7ENh7fxZdKqNnOTwkCIFyIIwIfpwlKBcaKlzlmlORsGjouGbJ1SJO8mh4vpe 9/6enuEiIxw9bkowC3EhSuJfSUj//WWBmTl5anF8Xl+8NyIuBVlyuK3ULVDfrDnWsvf0 UCyXvp9hG81KMLMbva22qJgzPQNx74VZHpSsST9A6kEmDwhDNqQD0nDSHxBWQXJa6/B/ HyCQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIJTb77QA/UvOBaVzLdUN3lpII1I1SnSlLGx14Kw2eJorZU7u2GU2rZ/IWP4yJeSS0rBVg0nD1f3nkiFA==
X-Received: by 10.46.75.1 with SMTP id y1mr1340040lja.75.1486354956588; Sun, 05 Feb 2017 20:22:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.20.67 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Feb 2017 20:22:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.25.20.67 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Feb 2017 20:22:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.20.1702052315130.13902@ary.qy>
References: <6391B5BB-19BD-4717-B9BB-ECD145F7B4F6@fugue.com> <20170206040516.1701.qmail@ary.lan> <CAPt1N1mbzhS19G_uDA8HokVxXuHy5uA7F1c84-1yUUpqZ2ifJQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1702052315130.13902@ary.qy>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2017 23:22:35 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1m2mowdCF6igU0TN-FCcjas9AaY-uGma4HgPGKx0Jg4Tw@mail.gmail.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045ea47a32b1dc0547d4fb04"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/DVkEoBtoduV5F4Kp2Y69oTvOsv0>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] ALT-TLD and (insecure) delgations.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 04:22:40 -0000

The working group has consensus to give it a try.  We may change our minds
of it takes too long, but it seems worth exploring from a process
perspective anyway.

On Feb 5, 2017 11:18 PM, "John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> I'm pretty sure I've explained it enough times on this mailing list and in
>> the relevant documents by now. If you don't agree, maybe we should just
>> accept that. If you don't remember the explanation, it's in the homenet
>> naming architecture doc I wrote.
>>
>
> Well, OK, I took another look, and from what I can see, it's a belief that
> people will find toaster.homenet.arpa harder or more confusing to type than
> toaster.homenet.
>
> Just out of curiosity, how long is it worth waiting to get .homenet rather
> than .homenet.arpa?  If it took five more years, which at the current rate
> seems optimistic, would homenet still be relevant?
>
> R's,
> John
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email