[DNSOP] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-04.txt

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 25 February 2020 02:13 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163B23A17E5 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:13:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dj7_K1Oy6lmM for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:13:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22c.google.com (mail-oi1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16ACE3A17E3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:13:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id a142so11046832oii.7 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:13:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=g7vsCJNkjy2sF6gplQGKB0dwaSTrLjYV9BzoKUxFwOE=; b=YcHoMoS37VDjoRrIXOBYyn7q/SLBsKPpFf5Q/8KfqxnYsCX4vJqhavDSF+iHe1xhpT Ro99KKm43vbuZ3S11Blc+4uTfwVAVN4zwmkqRiHGvRKRTfDTxolnXuNJXbOPWkdE1SKt 5E0lyBea7tFMsuM6cIQRGZTBCpJVzX7sn0vb5zyrn0nUFOis0ZColdnsLNwh9HTRJ7mk M0b2JtaClzJgbHEkMtZBEirAUJSMcKGhaYeB5SzL7eF/xQX5DB29EBWTaUaTyo3ArzEx N3IQnM+XuMuLOrtFpbAOzesvHAtOZc82hklkX3mGARqXzYkyrkweKp33W7O1gjKew7JK FjyQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=g7vsCJNkjy2sF6gplQGKB0dwaSTrLjYV9BzoKUxFwOE=; b=V7EywwBSamxakTHQ+bPV5KpuIUIGQS6yOicb7ZkvxKB1uWg0xRrsYTgW3oxqmABy1q diyD9b2YXL31o9+5J2/pwJOYV467YpS1KzEKFPjHoxpDUzNsTDFNI8FN0p258jMoOoRm f2alZEuPF4IA7AbEqOX4XmYKTlpGlPTnbhvKckmf3hx8x0kULw3xwSILwH6V+DSSLwzY lwESYacvgbtu0Eh9VUzYfsiPmtXjjQDbk8GTXOIDmv1vGrokUbwCCMS3g0wY9bhXJRVS DncHsRG73sqPN0BSeont1LCvOBFDqTF/ditNDBB/Keoxql7G/v5f6ehRAs+/j45H4otH NJZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUsu9xuLzlODzELeAC4KdYLIopQpHqbQLLyEdlUtGHQDN2TcN2x 70Qis4l5HlOs0pbZ6PkEFj9Y1Fh0upasPDkrkPYj9g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzRNAHJLaWOTBv1GMS7snxT4avZ/aygr5/jy3EmrDlFsjgh69OprjctdmgwB6K0yQlDukE5yrlcfxFo46oQ4n8=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:fc0c:: with SMTP id a12mr1618949oii.118.1582596786968; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:13:06 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158258479417.24286.15972230615732983631@ietfa.amsl.com> <25353EC1-D84B-4507-80F9-9059174B8D0C@verisign.com>
In-Reply-To: <25353EC1-D84B-4507-80F9-9059174B8D0C@verisign.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 21:12:55 -0500
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+E-fVZo-m9gS8YX86mk-XGbZADxQmOQqeSirMX0kJMcqQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0000000000005010ac059f5d07ba"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/DZRrQX-fQJWdlK-k9faE4GDQeNw>
Subject: [DNSOP] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 02:13:10 -0000

Thanks for the latest update Duane. This current update does appear to all
the comments that were raised during the first WGLC.

We'll kick off a second WGLC in a separate email.

Tim



On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 6:08 PM Wessels, Duane <dwessels=
40verisign.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> All,
>
> This version of the ZONEMD draft incorporates and addresses the feedback
> we received from the working group last call.  The list of changes is below.
>
> Note there is one important change to the RDATA fields that we believe
> addresses concerns about future proofing.
>
> Previously there was a field named Digest Type, whose meaning incorporated
> both the hash algorithm (e.g. SHA384) and a scheme for organizing the zone
> data as input to the hash function (e.g. "simple").  These have been split
> into separate fields now (Hash Algorithm and Scheme).  The Parameter field
> has been dropped, but we feel its intended use can still be accomplished
> with the Scheme field.
>
> We hope this version addresses all the comments received.  If there are
> any omissions it was not intentional.
>
> DW
>
>
>
>    From -03 to -04:
>
>    o  Addressing WGLC feedback.
>
>    o  Changed from "Digest Type + Paramter" to "Scheme + Hash
>       Algorithm".  This should make it more obvious how ZONEMD can be
>       expanded in the future with new schemes and hash algorithms, while
>       sacrificing some of the flexibility that the Parameter was
>       intended to provide.
>
>    o  Note: old RDATA fields: Serial, Digest Type, Parameter, Digest.
>
>    o  Note: new RDATA fields: Serial, Scheme, Hash Algorithm, Digest.
>
>    o  Add new IANA requirement for a Scheme registry.
>
>    o  Rearranged some sections and separated scheme-specific aspects
>       from general aspects of digest calculation.
>
>    o  When discussing multiple ZONEMD RRs, allow for Scheme, as well as
>       Hash Algorithm, transition.
>
>    o  Added Performance Considerations section with some benchmarks.
>
>    o  Further clarifications about non-apex ZONEMD RRs.
>
>    o  Clarified inclusion rule for duplicate RRs.
>
>    o  Removed or lowercased some inappropriately used RFC 2119 key
>       words.
>
>    o  Clarified that all ZONEMD RRs, even for unsupported hash
>       algorithms, must be zeroized during digest calculation.
>
>    o  Added Resilience and Fragility to security considerations.
>
>    o  Updated examples since changes in this version result in different
>       hash values.
>
>
>
> > On Feb 24, 2020, at 2:53 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> >
> >
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> > This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the
> IETF.
> >
> >        Title           : Message Digest for DNS Zones
> >        Authors         : Duane Wessels
> >                          Piet Barber
> >                          Matt Weinberg
> >                          Warren Kumari
> >                          Wes Hardaker
> >       Filename        : draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-04.txt
> >       Pages           : 32
> >       Date            : 2020-02-24
> >
> > Abstract:
> >   This document describes a protocol and new DNS Resource Record that
> >   can be used to provide a cryptographic message digest over DNS zone
> >   data.  The ZONEMD Resource Record conveys the digest data in the zone
> >   itself.  When a zone publisher includes an ZONEMD record, recipients
> >   can verify the zone contents for accuracy and completeness.  This
> >   provides assurance that received zone data matches published data,
> >   regardless of how the zone data has been transmitted and received.
> >
> >   ZONEMD is not designed to replace DNSSEC.  Whereas DNSSEC protects
> >   individual RRSets (DNS data with fine granularity), ZONEMD protects a
> >   zone's data as a whole, whether consumed by authoritative name
> >   servers, recursive name servers, or any other applications.
> >
> >   As specified at this time, ZONEMD is not designed for use in large,
> >   dynamic zones due to the time and resources required for digest
> >   calculation.  The ZONEMD record described in this document is
> >   designed so that new digest schemes may be developed in the future to
> >   support large, dynamic zones.
> >
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest/
> >
> > There are also htmlized versions available at:
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-04
> >
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-04
> >
> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-04
> >
> >
> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> >
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > DNSOP mailing list
> > DNSOP@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>