[DNSOP] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-04.txt
Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 25 February 2020 02:13 UTC
Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163B23A17E5 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:13:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dj7_K1Oy6lmM for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:13:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22c.google.com (mail-oi1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16ACE3A17E3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:13:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id a142so11046832oii.7 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:13:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=g7vsCJNkjy2sF6gplQGKB0dwaSTrLjYV9BzoKUxFwOE=; b=YcHoMoS37VDjoRrIXOBYyn7q/SLBsKPpFf5Q/8KfqxnYsCX4vJqhavDSF+iHe1xhpT Ro99KKm43vbuZ3S11Blc+4uTfwVAVN4zwmkqRiHGvRKRTfDTxolnXuNJXbOPWkdE1SKt 5E0lyBea7tFMsuM6cIQRGZTBCpJVzX7sn0vb5zyrn0nUFOis0ZColdnsLNwh9HTRJ7mk M0b2JtaClzJgbHEkMtZBEirAUJSMcKGhaYeB5SzL7eF/xQX5DB29EBWTaUaTyo3ArzEx N3IQnM+XuMuLOrtFpbAOzesvHAtOZc82hklkX3mGARqXzYkyrkweKp33W7O1gjKew7JK FjyQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=g7vsCJNkjy2sF6gplQGKB0dwaSTrLjYV9BzoKUxFwOE=; b=V7EywwBSamxakTHQ+bPV5KpuIUIGQS6yOicb7ZkvxKB1uWg0xRrsYTgW3oxqmABy1q diyD9b2YXL31o9+5J2/pwJOYV467YpS1KzEKFPjHoxpDUzNsTDFNI8FN0p258jMoOoRm f2alZEuPF4IA7AbEqOX4XmYKTlpGlPTnbhvKckmf3hx8x0kULw3xwSILwH6V+DSSLwzY lwESYacvgbtu0Eh9VUzYfsiPmtXjjQDbk8GTXOIDmv1vGrokUbwCCMS3g0wY9bhXJRVS DncHsRG73sqPN0BSeont1LCvOBFDqTF/ditNDBB/Keoxql7G/v5f6ehRAs+/j45H4otH NJZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUsu9xuLzlODzELeAC4KdYLIopQpHqbQLLyEdlUtGHQDN2TcN2x 70Qis4l5HlOs0pbZ6PkEFj9Y1Fh0upasPDkrkPYj9g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzRNAHJLaWOTBv1GMS7snxT4avZ/aygr5/jy3EmrDlFsjgh69OprjctdmgwB6K0yQlDukE5yrlcfxFo46oQ4n8=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:fc0c:: with SMTP id a12mr1618949oii.118.1582596786968; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:13:06 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158258479417.24286.15972230615732983631@ietfa.amsl.com> <25353EC1-D84B-4507-80F9-9059174B8D0C@verisign.com>
In-Reply-To: <25353EC1-D84B-4507-80F9-9059174B8D0C@verisign.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 21:12:55 -0500
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+E-fVZo-m9gS8YX86mk-XGbZADxQmOQqeSirMX0kJMcqQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0000000000005010ac059f5d07ba"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/DZRrQX-fQJWdlK-k9faE4GDQeNw>
Subject: [DNSOP] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 02:13:10 -0000
Thanks for the latest update Duane. This current update does appear to all the comments that were raised during the first WGLC. We'll kick off a second WGLC in a separate email. Tim On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 6:08 PM Wessels, Duane <dwessels= 40verisign.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > All, > > This version of the ZONEMD draft incorporates and addresses the feedback > we received from the working group last call. The list of changes is below. > > Note there is one important change to the RDATA fields that we believe > addresses concerns about future proofing. > > Previously there was a field named Digest Type, whose meaning incorporated > both the hash algorithm (e.g. SHA384) and a scheme for organizing the zone > data as input to the hash function (e.g. "simple"). These have been split > into separate fields now (Hash Algorithm and Scheme). The Parameter field > has been dropped, but we feel its intended use can still be accomplished > with the Scheme field. > > We hope this version addresses all the comments received. If there are > any omissions it was not intentional. > > DW > > > > From -03 to -04: > > o Addressing WGLC feedback. > > o Changed from "Digest Type + Paramter" to "Scheme + Hash > Algorithm". This should make it more obvious how ZONEMD can be > expanded in the future with new schemes and hash algorithms, while > sacrificing some of the flexibility that the Parameter was > intended to provide. > > o Note: old RDATA fields: Serial, Digest Type, Parameter, Digest. > > o Note: new RDATA fields: Serial, Scheme, Hash Algorithm, Digest. > > o Add new IANA requirement for a Scheme registry. > > o Rearranged some sections and separated scheme-specific aspects > from general aspects of digest calculation. > > o When discussing multiple ZONEMD RRs, allow for Scheme, as well as > Hash Algorithm, transition. > > o Added Performance Considerations section with some benchmarks. > > o Further clarifications about non-apex ZONEMD RRs. > > o Clarified inclusion rule for duplicate RRs. > > o Removed or lowercased some inappropriately used RFC 2119 key > words. > > o Clarified that all ZONEMD RRs, even for unsupported hash > algorithms, must be zeroized during digest calculation. > > o Added Resilience and Fragility to security considerations. > > o Updated examples since changes in this version result in different > hash values. > > > > > On Feb 24, 2020, at 2:53 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > > > > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > > This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the > IETF. > > > > Title : Message Digest for DNS Zones > > Authors : Duane Wessels > > Piet Barber > > Matt Weinberg > > Warren Kumari > > Wes Hardaker > > Filename : draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-04.txt > > Pages : 32 > > Date : 2020-02-24 > > > > Abstract: > > This document describes a protocol and new DNS Resource Record that > > can be used to provide a cryptographic message digest over DNS zone > > data. The ZONEMD Resource Record conveys the digest data in the zone > > itself. When a zone publisher includes an ZONEMD record, recipients > > can verify the zone contents for accuracy and completeness. This > > provides assurance that received zone data matches published data, > > regardless of how the zone data has been transmitted and received. > > > > ZONEMD is not designed to replace DNSSEC. Whereas DNSSEC protects > > individual RRSets (DNS data with fine granularity), ZONEMD protects a > > zone's data as a whole, whether consumed by authoritative name > > servers, recursive name servers, or any other applications. > > > > As specified at this time, ZONEMD is not designed for use in large, > > dynamic zones due to the time and resources required for digest > > calculation. The ZONEMD record described in this document is > > designed so that new digest schemes may be developed in the future to > > support large, dynamic zones. > > > > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest/ > > > > There are also htmlized versions available at: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-04 > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-04 > > > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-04 > > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission > > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > DNSOP mailing list > > DNSOP@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
- [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-dig… internet-drafts
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone… Wessels, Duane
- [DNSOP] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zon… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone… Michael StJohns
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone… Wessels, Duane
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone… Michael StJohns