IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-02.txt

Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu> Mon, 09 March 2015 14:22 UTC

Return-Path: <rharolde@umich.edu>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBDCF1A8710 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 07:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uqDBLsAiC06m for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 07:22:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-f171.google.com (mail-lb0-f171.google.com [209.85.217.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5447D1A88B3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 07:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lbiz12 with SMTP id z12so43531519lbi.12 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 07:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+3M8ew6y2m3IS3sXS/UuVlFgSTsA3dgxWiUR0sl2apk=; b=QvaR662USJmUZiFQSon5URLhRor7+tjFFUpY+hKvbjUbnDBZ72sP07vSrwJIuj6+IY WyyNoVdOocAds4OLqKh2Fsk7Mo+fna10Toq57UfpsI6n0Ij9QcR25ZHo6btJEuijhxiY /wbwEY3VGnE/wOQCdxvbkdTBahptCwLEyEtrGWxcFyQrmHkSKHtc5B8MeVliq8Gw47rF 3R2hu7hHAFaUDkQFfIbqjMwoSjL93ywnUCk27PppNuadmsTQPXbjr7hwCf7S3RbukLWc iYCNuf3yU6dv/OdgBquvC0LEkb80OAFrpKHARPTH6nVj6v+kxSUNgfSXWlz2wkf5QAb0 k1jQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnGkHVDB4E5dLnhs3TJ1e7sMmyBPVGILRIoyPDmQQqVSv+WbBmDDHTCGKrV9UqJplpQMgxl
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.178.164 with SMTP id cz4mr25679816lac.39.1425910908781; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 07:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.60.170 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 07:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150309141235.GA4605@nic.fr>
References: <20150304125319.14932.18909.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+nkc8B+rOiq+f6dP6o3uFSH+J+q04Q-6eADSpXj0kE_R2bRHQ@mail.gmail.com> <20150309141235.GA4605@nic.fr>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 10:21:48 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+nkc8D-T4G7KMy8=OPb4ibKjFeC+R91OgzguZfP4cho0JD3gg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113406f43313530510dbc1c4"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/DgbV2DgWi34z_r--OUKQX-kd2sg>
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:22:16 -0000

On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 08:10:11AM -0500,
>  Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu> wrote
>  a message of 218 lines which said:
>
> > I think the change in section 4 "Performance implications" is incorrect:
>
> This was reported by a native english speaker and committed here
> <
> https://github.com/bortzmeyer/my-IETF-work/commit/4d8c75529ccec0cea334d78a665f73ebde27d897#diff-64cb8059630496a308f9d7d0f81ff316L197
> >
>
> If I understand you, "inferior" in english has only the meaning "not
> as good as" and never "fewer than" (which may be a good thing, which
> is the case here)?
>
> Yes, that is how I understand it.  Can someone else confirm or deny?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email