[DNSOP] search for normative reference

Andreas Schulze <sca@andreasschulze.de> Wed, 18 December 2013 07:12 UTC

Return-Path: <sca@andreasschulze.de>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5A71AE0DD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 23:12:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gZ2qdJYpt837 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 23:12:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.andreasschulze.de (mout.andreasschulze.de [84.201.4.158]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F26191AE0D8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 23:12:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: line deleted by mout
X-Received: line deleted by mout
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=andreasschulze.de; s=GzhbMIk; t=1387350746; r=y; bh=w4lt8peMbXesSp6S7nj78vXl5jaWpls7KujYgnhR0uE=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=Cq3A0xELNThkw8aryloXaNKlZjfPL5RK8IMqw+56p9nd/kQxWmBSXTI4D85NvDmiK 9xasz1ij5qrcrxf5XuqMFRX978wEw3JvuJFRfgnQRBTA3l2U4IU2MtmVktWrr1rEVG QeVSXxjUiGim496wP1W+qedif8PAmMi6Gy31SqvWLgG46rh+/beq0UhNcK8HpP0vLH 9Yp4SOGx3CLGUhRiV04dhuRGv3yh2oGGLaxD+txUJpAEe7dmps3DSIAE3Deyjm1jPj H/kqv0qpn3YuCl8+gLdhAfXokf+EL1GAE//tR6PAVmkyENNHERQfzzwMK8ZEQ/cWGp 22J+riEmoOwuHU9yHmkNNNnSFkaSDMN1TqfsXwOpc5bZHkHNTY78e2ueXuffXaH4fu C31VCNJh+1ZE2JL5GzsaTpTNz3F9/GjOrEGLe97tccSQ1RG1QQQ+R7wRJXssZXoBsW jkCi1ScNjf/NJdJ8QOdRsSm7iARstu9ckwFL4VIIDRG5YtBJwnwpHJbWlzu6t00Zu1 5ZJwNBq8f6hVuLiBcEcSvPw5oayGgcdA+1YGaFkse0VEvhlLRt77wAeJaNx+yX+YA+ OVWdsPvxNCDR9iB/yBU7jBT/zeEeIrJmF7pg27I0lEWSaPy/eBIgIMtydcOZY+ac6Q ObTH+ZFGSXLDnPUNU12M6NdE=
X-Received: line deleted by mout
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 08:12:24 +0100
Message-ID: <20131218081224.Horde.vc5ABSJLAukUw7zWbybLIA3@horde.andreasschulze.de>
From: Andreas Schulze <sca@andreasschulze.de>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H5 (6.1.6)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: [DNSOP] search for normative reference
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 07:12:35 -0000

Hello,

I was requested to delegate a new subzone to nameservers with private  
ip addresses.
I know it's at least not what makes me happy. But are there IETF  
recommendations against this?
That would help me to drop the request.

Thanks
Andreas