Re: [DNSOP] sentinel and timing?

Robert Story <rstory@isi.edu> Thu, 08 February 2018 02:55 UTC

Return-Path: <rstory@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E4C129C51 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 18:55:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=isi-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UWZVK5jBrih4 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 18:55:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22f.google.com (mail-yw0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEE67129515 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 18:55:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id c78so1614920ywb.13 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 18:55:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isi-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version; bh=CMqwMDjxKbVWATY4LSGoukmop2qCFPM7mou0hISSy80=; b=ZN6TiIJmbqtg6iNCBZG3/6ixCPy52+ZMMcCrem3CyXFL3o7b1PoNFexEMk6yMu6fnc VXAlbvK9MSfcu7LqAtxkpPZHtSYCj4l512Zsgdxn4VmjVgDQ0TtUXCLW+JUQrwy6mda9 Vm5ZfAoto99yB5pqDefh20QXeYO/tWyu7xnpXQZkGkjDVKI/ea3o/ehpIJTzOJKHkK2Z Nr6vsKb0rpqSNMp1FpIX+mdxVLokg/Hfzx4/SmN/XwC9G3N10rK6r6MPexAyqXc2roXE WMgl62nwXFsSFgRFrWna5fV5wH/RUq71hLIfPVtteH/oyT8RIgoCeSqDJn/jV9lItVFx D7PQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version; bh=CMqwMDjxKbVWATY4LSGoukmop2qCFPM7mou0hISSy80=; b=jyXqKVykBtQJP/lElKdI1S9sdvGcBz7hGBnIArPXzwvUjZ1VEVn4j1PqwZHHF3xCey y1TlOecP4VFMLtjMbS06ZVnc1gbsxrypGlf2j9NA/GsfUUt+eXz75xVRA7aJ146ndu4r fVFPJpoAc6mssd9F+dX3HV6+7CyEMvlv81YEX6KUqbYXWBI3EgoryRi7Riq2b31q/Y/N cfxQpdSdd1KBJH207Vstb1aZ01j/LQZiJReVeJaTwtcYtKUUMCy3wXivSWran6iVajbR up6edOWwnOvXWksQaU2dkg8V2ILIOjzb9kFGyk9Xjq1ACZUf23K+HZehZKa2B9mLvIM/ eX6A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPB1mft2sPN/4LdOfU9BldnYnn3dhj9ofor491Ps5UQ1Fn9A3VuL nHvJbwZA6zHbX+6mziZtDvOaNg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225LhlkcpaS78VcjtBes7kJPxHfh48lrlHa7aGdkVcVK9kANdwtWro9Dt4l8YQm+6A0jImoZsw==
X-Received: by 10.37.79.130 with SMTP id d124mr5605370ybb.200.1518058507950; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 18:55:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from titan.int.futz.org (c-73-43-1-81.hsd1.ga.comcast.net. [73.43.1.81]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u9sm1078383ywi.17.2018.02.07.18.55.06 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 07 Feb 2018 18:55:07 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 21:55:02 -0500
From: Robert Story <rstory@isi.edu>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20180207215502.46daf6bc@titan.int.futz.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1802071035280.6369@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1802071035280.6369@bofh.nohats.ca>
Organization: USC Information Sciences Institute
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.1-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/0tEhTL/_Iu2bnVEAR6Psmdw"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Dl5WoTlc9LpUBErDTHBxJCgQ5Is>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] sentinel and timing?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 02:55:11 -0000

On Wed 2018-02-07 10:43:16-0500 Paul wrote:
> How about using this query to also encode an
> uptime-processstartedtime value? Maybe with accurancy reduced to
> minutes. I think that would return valuable data.

-1 for feature creep and the technical reasons Joe mentioned.

Maybe we need a SNMP over DNS draft? :-p

-- 
Robert Story <http://www.isi.edu/~rstory>
USC Information Sciences Institute <http://www.isi.edu/>