Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-rpz

Vladimír Čunát <> Fri, 06 October 2017 15:28 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 267B71349F4 for <>; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 08:28:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YL-yYnEwjcq2 for <>; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 08:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:1488:800:400::400]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FD4F133059 for <>; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 08:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:1488:fffe:6:bc7e:5cff:fe79:ae7b] (unknown [IPv6:2001:1488:fffe:6:bc7e:5cff:fe79:ae7b]) by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD4E461136; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 17:28:24 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;; s=default; t=1507303704; bh=OS+Oadf+37/Ac9mNxS4ppBZrRr9mZQH4NEN8jqH0pjA=; h=To:From:Date; b=I2pV2KhjyykDQmHMMkIJMWoXrJ/p9LHKuhn7PuS5W4JvtLG1YLTvVC+7dMmDv2kwG Z4oW3AetmVzumjciMinRdhBRXi4pd1oqra2tL1RcRNLTsa0+J64Rt6DgfVpMGFBFpu BDmo7ettrqqO0u8yv/dF5+Y66lKyx1+s0J1Su0ic=
To: Vernon Schryver <>
References: <>
From: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltw61yIMSMdW7DoXQ=?= <>
Message-ID: <>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 17:28:24 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-rpz
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 15:28:35 -0000


On 10/06/2017 05:00 PM, Vernon Schryver wrote:
> If you will include hooks for an RPZ implementation in your shipped
> code as opposed to modified source in a 'contrib' directory that
> users must compile specially, I'd be happy to try to propose such
> hooks.  In other words, I could try to make a patch for Knot Resolver
> like the patch that I wrote for Unbound (without cost to NLnet Labs).
> If you prefer, you could write the code.

The current very limited implementation of RPZ in knot-resolver [1] is
done via a couple dozen lines of lua code, i.e. only JIT-compiled.  The
approach might remain similar, perhaps a bit more modularized, but in
any case I expect it would be included by default, so I wouldn't fear
about users having to recompile.