Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] DNSOP Document Adoption Poll (June 2022)

Brian Dickson <> Thu, 07 July 2022 19:20 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 019ACC15AE21; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 12:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wUzCtZRkXTvn; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 12:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::433]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A9FEC14F74B; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 12:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id d10so7551158pfd.9; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 12:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lnBkUD9WHt5fZSfpotyA3XbPsDI+iq61kcgR7N6rFDY=; b=iNZ3jNcpz/ItP/pUWgHbzcU39HleEYkTHFhuhhzK4rzFpraqkwArT++dQZt+I0YiWA 9y06HDSW3F6FDQxVyCMQrMT0sqxy/tW4wHGgTbYCMHEHNMtl0VpncesPo0YbJ0y2jFxv InSW+bl36aAdPyDdkA9B0koVpl6A8d0JLOp8KhuWEK/0+gpQ1JUPUOB/Sj4+nwHFlgEX c86i6FJEDrtUHr1gs3l/PWUyA7fSkRmBpALNA8+7SetJEXgOLyezwEVEeuzrdBWMIGZa b5Xukh6LiNJERRkIDNCujCgO1hNOH0J4X0lmsUHUCvcv7eSirxKFSOVThDi3Jf+dKIvs RX6g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lnBkUD9WHt5fZSfpotyA3XbPsDI+iq61kcgR7N6rFDY=; b=rD/VACI8CB+0TfDMfnue4JPSTkVcO9g8XKTT5N1/4tjCBrbrqCADyRfZSWAHQ8RcGo IuDTTxntiTHP/DEJMm2MMCemhDT/v8Y3n4P0FJ3jv1xeytnIQserKSXViJV3rwJI50X4 dwm6d3A7kQANIEAcOwc3v9CyRj4chk92PDi7bqw1E+YUndiKbwOdd1u0kHW7B0E6A81t wmHKo3lo7n10U2sCgPhGG1PpSpXKLtcVW/vMjaXno9V3IXL3B+XXOJLcseb+GlRmkRtN NOZSqQtqKfAYsskGLOYinuy36P9/97O1Fvo/OHACO6mIWqPSobjMBEJU2aWan2PVzETc Wuog==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+NrZcHUTMAj9W3uE7RI2H+OpDdccHO3+yzdrctgqdtKv30OPdY 1BSpvbX6DBvTuIcNTKeQkoOUATUXWLUCVd6aEnOY++Rl
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1uuerA+ao+clw5Az/CW66Nq9D0xhI7N/DHhIwgSSg8Uk9lB27hbywfL9FxQswXpG8alQG5FthRmc35o9btogek=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ab53:b0:16b:ecde:3dfc with SMTP id ij19-20020a170902ab5300b0016becde3dfcmr19392046plb.131.1657221646881; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 12:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Brian Dickson <>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2022 12:20:35 -0700
Message-ID: <>
To: Paul Hoffman <>
Cc: DNSOP Chairs <>, DNSOP Working Group <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009399d605e33bfb06"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] DNSOP Document Adoption Poll (June 2022)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2022 19:20:48 -0000

Honestly, since doing any sort of poll is "new", maybe the first poll
should have been, is doing this via a poll acceptable as a process/policy
thing for the WG?

Doing such a poll should include not only how folks feel about using polls
for this, but also could ask people to indicate the likelihood that they
would participate in future polls, as well as their opinions on how long
polls should run?

I have not answered the poll in question, FYI, and definitely prefer
discussing individual WG items, even if there happen to be a large number
of them.

I see this as a "vote with your feet" issue. Send many items to the list,
and the important ones will get responses (from the perspective of each
participant of what is important).

The result would basically have a figure-skating-judging element. What
matters is not the absolute numbers, what matters is the ordinality (sort
order) of participants, upon aggregation.

My $0.02.


On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 7:58 AM Paul Hoffman <> wrote:

> On Jul 7, 2022, at 6:49 AM, Benno Overeinder <> wrote:
> > Gentle reminder, the poll runs until July 9.
> Can you say how the poll will be used? There was pretty strong push-back
> after the original announcement, and it's thus unclear how the poll results
> will be acted on.
> --Paul Hoffman
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list