Re: [DNSOP] extension of DoH to authoritative servers

[Stephane Bortzmeyer <[e-mail]>]

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 02:18:39PM -0800,
 Paul Vixie <[e-mail]> wrote 
 a message of 20 lines which said:

> > Right.   So what’s to stop other malicious traffic from doing the
> > same thing?
> 
> lack of an IETF-approved standard with planned implementation by a
> half dozen tech giants, means that other malicious traffic will not
> be able to hide in the crowd, and can be made subject to policy, and
> complaints.

An IETF standard make things easier for the implementer and increases
the chances of success (that's why we develop standards, after all)
but it is not the only way to "massive deployment including half dozen
tech giants". So, not having DoH would not stop evil name resolution.

> i want DoT to be used instead,

Then petition the many hotspots, hotels, cafes, corporations, etc,
that block everything but 443. It is because of them that we need DoH,
not just DoT.