Re: [DNSOP] draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout-02.txt

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Tue, 05 March 2019 13:21 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EACC1310A1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 05:21:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NbUjOydDX6s2 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 05:20:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41F841310F1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 05:20:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:34128) by ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.139]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1h1A05-000COC-j1 (Exim 4.91) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Tue, 05 Mar 2019 13:20:53 +0000
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 13:20:53 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <734DF7A6-4EC1-4BC1-8704-94CA7D4254FA@bangj.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1903051313260.19193@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <155174561875.5229.8071756187245291024.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <49504B63-84EA-4E56-AF96-30F2AE09450F@bangj.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1903051216270.13313@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <734DF7A6-4EC1-4BC1-8704-94CA7D4254FA@bangj.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="1870870841-777756798-1551792053=:19193"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/DtdIjAsTOZ5Cv5l2x9Lar0IIoS8>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 13:21:00 -0000

Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry if that freaked you out.

I wasn't freaked out, I just thought the response was directed to the
wrong place. I didn't bring up the issue for a two-way discussion, I
wanted to see what other wg participants thought.

> https://github.com/pusateri/draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout
>
> and anyone is welcome to open issues if they like so I don’t think we
> need to replicate this info to the mailing list each time.

The wg mailing list is where group decisions are supposed to be taken.
I don't particularly want to have to poll another (counting the dnsop
drafts) 35 places to find out if maybe some discussion has happened.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Fitzroy, Sole: South, veering northwest later, 6 to gale 8, perhaps severe
gale 9 later in Fitzroy. Rough or very rough, becoming high for a time in
southwest Fitzroy. Rain, then thundery showers. Moderate or poor, occasionally
good.