Re: [DNSOP] Updated NSEC5 protocol spec and paper

Dave Lawrence <tale@dd.org> Tue, 07 March 2017 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <tale@dd.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884071295C0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:02:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id msh00tKldFLc for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:02:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gro.dd.org (gro.dd.org [207.136.192.136]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD11F129503 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:01:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by gro.dd.org (Postfix, from userid 102) id 322FB3F468; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 11:01:51 -0500 (EST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <22718.55663.86767.508579@gro.dd.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 11:01:51 -0500
From: Dave Lawrence <tale@dd.org>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+Lwhk9pkV5SVNNHPH0fUeA9zkpE7cJJ5k04xPEKiDTKF-mQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHPuVdXTcSaVcN6fBbPy3e=PgRvg8=GemSN_YFhzX387x8YW-A@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwhk9pkV5SVNNHPH0fUeA9zkpE7cJJ5k04xPEKiDTKF-mQ@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Dwf1EYV8iVt7B8aTfKiSQp1iEfM>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Updated NSEC5 protocol spec and paper
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 16:02:51 -0000

Phillip Hallam-Baker writes:
> There are two reasons for splitting out the VRF [...]
 
Thanks, Phill!  Those were our thoughts as well.  Though the VRF
appendix is still included in -04, the VRF document has already been
started.  It is planned that the appendix will disappear (to be
replaced with examples of different nsec5 responses) and the VRF
document incorporated by normative reference.