IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption draft-vixie-dns-rpz

bert hubert <bert.hubert@powerdns.com> Wed, 21 December 2016 07:15 UTC

Return-Path: <bert.hubert@powerdns.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC563129420 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 23:15:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wk570FtHoFPK for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 23:15:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tmpmail.powerdns.com (tmpmail.powerdns.com [128.199.32.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFAE9129480 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 23:15:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tmpmail.powerdns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4016C7EF; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 02:14:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tmpmail.powerdns.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tmpmail.powerdns.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gffnXhpARl-a; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 02:14:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from server.ds9a.nl (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f15:bba::42]) by tmpmail.powerdns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4731A6C7ED; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 02:14:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: by server.ds9a.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 81A99AC2DFB; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 08:14:36 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 08:14:36 +0100
From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@powerdns.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Message-ID: <20161221071436.GD884@server.ds9a.nl>
References: <CADyWQ+ETSd199ok0fgh=PB=--hW7buPgSoCg22aK51Bk4xxBmw@mail.gmail.com> <C18E2D4E-EE89-4AF6-B4A0-FAD1A7A01B5E@vpnc.org> <8f78a52b-01ae-f529-a1ec-d7eb90fe94be@bellis.me.uk> <6EBB4C5C-E2D9-40B9-86B8-03614804282D@vpnc.org> <20161220174650.GA884@server.ds9a.nl> <E6401D03-04D9-4884-ABC7-022C2E763B0C@vpnc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E6401D03-04D9-4884-ABC7-022C2E763B0C@vpnc.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/DypqGedfS5k9NU-r_PFMJmk4qvA>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption draft-vixie-dns-rpz
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 07:15:12 -0000

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:46:40AM -0800, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> >Unbound is also slated to have support for RPZ.
> Unbound can document it or point to the ISC documentation.

We might as well stop doing standards all together then. We have something
that works. It interoperates. There is an ecosystem of services around it.

And what do people say? "Not going to standardize it".

The thing is, RPZ is not actually something that was slapped together. It
makes sense. Vernon and Paul clearly were on to something when they wrote
it.

In other words, it is not "documenting a configuration file". It is a great
thing to be able to point to and say this is the standard, this is how we do
things.

But meanwhile I will now use TCP/IP to send this message, without having to
refer to some old BSD documentation.

	Bert

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status