IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Agenda for IETF100

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Fri, 10 November 2017 19:04 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A0E91293F2 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 11:04:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=virtualized-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IPTpGqBRazKD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 11:04:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x236.google.com (mail-pg0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2770B1293E0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 11:04:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x236.google.com with SMTP id j16so2532990pgn.9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 11:04:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=virtualized-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version; bh=R1uwJvf1MRlSh0teK6HRUFQH6/+BBggMbJinTPI+T4A=; b=aQj10fe0CdiXlprqapRnF7bCZvr22ZuS1mHf85efTBvxsbUxv/RWgt6bFopdJgqbOr WSJcx7lnUwYh1+jM3942lwuGTb/tOHctDgoTughH1FqReaNB73YHLz8SypscXUEjLu+x rBJBsIrrLDpCdQvyMghT8YKGMnyEEVnEMjB0W7aXJTelhnLzbmPA7yiLPbWYB525qm6L vSKv2JhXwMND6sJXC/8z8xmTEYhtf3xvnqDkM21HXSDCKeQ/qTHeOtzKouAnziddNFK3 mQDnH7nHLd1rNgbvGplkBcHOyF7VNFJzrOfLXfppJw2YlE5PSmdPxC5zeSkHdlYqZhiy NApw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version; bh=R1uwJvf1MRlSh0teK6HRUFQH6/+BBggMbJinTPI+T4A=; b=Pl/9F2RMqhrF5XlPBWMgE1WjbT3RfoQmAaCEwRyAbT9efkeEutdRDPXtWeXrIHtL9C /ObCExhVFruD5IPCjI/p5Ut6hrk0ykzhzIZzaZtlf2/SjxAF/q8+jqbb9dvpqr3xrp7I 0EA5Fsnj7H2X1W57f7GxHJhhLKCYpWp/aJOrd72tG3cqby94y0VCMLlTlM4/dMumEB8e r5gNl5jeGBmcYBUE7aN9s1rcB/YgfHja6knqY7i0XJedp11FS3LzdsPR7VqHVsHpKrYl RqHDRGkOEpUWxgzcidtNlRXNXooNe5QdArdPzmH4tRJ3HDnUODhAL5nIBtevpzbtIrja GhHw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6PVAUhDQSuWl7683KtLYf1o4wL6qH9wivy29y+oJKdz1mrmWLu RjG8ar8xH74OR/HZm2ec9fuHWg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbMQ/bppos1FbDT8CyRzSs56lEIdBHL3xo1Hf6ZUmWFS84lo+Xq11XuMN7Mkb2DgVsOwFs8Pg==
X-Received: by 10.99.127.67 with SMTP id p3mr1241657pgn.321.1510340655619; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 11:04:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.148.71] ([101.100.166.3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x1sm18552880pfh.113.2017.11.10.11.04.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Nov 2017 11:04:14 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 02:59:28 +0800
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Cc: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <809562de-bbde-4548-a701-fe7fbfef6b5e@Spark>
In-Reply-To: <A85950D8-499F-4A83-A4C0-56B035AA8E37@nohats.ca>
References: <CADyWQ+HJyM5aUe4UpmU3vuzjaqOkzvC1+_bpvYd=dv93yzAewg@mail.gmail.com> <20171110121600.GA2749@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <EC0E4D2D-E9B1-4A1A-B3D5-24AD672DAFC0@nohats.ca> <20171110142508.GA4062@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <A85950D8-499F-4A83-A4C0-56B035AA8E37@nohats.ca>
X-Readdle-Message-ID: 809562de-bbde-4548-a701-fe7fbfef6b5e@Spark
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="5a05f82a_625558ec_800"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/E0dKXu1yQJ2npRmxq2R64i9yuUo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Agenda for IETF100
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 19:04:19 -0000

Can confirm, as can anyone willing to go to an Adobe Connect archive. For the curious:

https://participate.icann.org/p6u03rimy92/?launcher=false&fcsContent=true&pbMode=normal

The discussion on Ethereum by Leonard Tan, an Ethereum developer, starts at 00:31:00. Paul’s question is at 00:42:16. From the transcript:

>> PAUL:  PAUL, IETF.  LET'S SAY IETF GETS THE DOMAINS IETF IN THIS NAMING SYSTEM AND WE PAY OUR FEES FOR A COUPLE OF YEARS.  EVERYBODY USES THE SITE.  AND THEN AT SOME POINT WE FORGET TO PAY AND THE DOMAIN FALLS BACK INTO THE POOL AND SOMEBODY ELSE REGISTERS IT AND WE DON'T KNOW WHERE THEY ARE OR WHO THEY ARE.  NOW I GO TO A COURT SYSTEM.  I GET SOME LEGAL OPINION SAYING I OWN THIS TRADEMARK AND NOW I WANT TO GET THIS DOMAIN BACK.  IS THERE ANY WAY FOR ME TO GET THIS DOMAIN BACK?
>>LEONARD TAN:  SO RIGHT NOW, THE ENS INDUSTRY, YOU CAN CHANGE IT BECAUSE IT REQUIRES FOUR OUT OF SEVEN PEOPLE.  MOST OF THEM ARE ETHEREUM DEVELOPERS.  AND IT IS A CONSENSUS OF THEM TO MAKE ANY CHANGES.  SO IT IS POSSIBLE, BUT IT IS GOING TO BE A VERY DIFFICULT THING TO DO.

Regards,
-drc

On Nov 10, 2017, 10:47 PM +0800, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, wrote:
> The ENS developer said so in response to my question.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Nov 10, 2017, at 19:55, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 05:58:13PM +0530,
> > Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote
> > a message of 29 lines which said:
> >
> > > It takes 4 out of 7 geeks to bypass the blockchain in case of
> > > emergency, court orders or kneecaps.
> > >
> > > According to the presentation held at ICANN60
> >
> > Well, if someone at ICANN said so, someone is wrong (or, at the
> > minimum, over-simplificator).
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > DNSOP mailing list
> > DNSOP@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email