IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-pan-dnsop-swild-rr-type-00.txt

Davey Song <songlinjian@gmail.com> Wed, 16 August 2017 08:44 UTC

Return-Path: <songlinjian@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA8E132641 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 01:44:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FWa5UzYWMnYB for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 01:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22d.google.com (mail-vk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F0C3132671 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 01:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id u133so10013610vke.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 01:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4guTfzsTZOoh33TzykX0yiSkvmaYHQdDXP6hw88Ezik=; b=eGm+jOYNXqx/3O++UqdS+9kFywWBp+lnUW9ZG8C70HJm7YAvhPUTQSa65aYZwTGTWN l1VRtxi2DmTIFk6n5loAuSBUuZ84UvA1qhXu3ccfhQvhuXY99BbUypnuDB7T/WqpWLHA CQnkz/xwtqCHGXfveNGppCxvD1zzZsaVFmxtYiZalnGgHMnUCHRO4HetUW+VytHBcq3T Ucvm8FRiIn0qwYhLQhoGj2oU45p7PCs/N8jtPR86Je3LPSxj3oR0PxgzBhFQNKN10tys vK9SwjxIcuRoS6Q5C7fjUB3e/vK1XEKTFz4GCjGaWLyqDta9HoUbqkV9yLg+biRHfkHz xO+g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4guTfzsTZOoh33TzykX0yiSkvmaYHQdDXP6hw88Ezik=; b=GAnKUWWUD4OomyHZED0/+HyaWIR8XuOPcFqW2IK6Sre6Kl6eUWamh5XcugZTfuPsPS ZPCdXZWJS3+ktZBIZKyZtVkhiwBEu8Ub8WpZRc4OucAViwLcwjBJaPGPQvNsmrJuJc65 9E5kdrni3ZtB7sMk6j1rQbud2Rk9xxPAsZx2zncplShVHZ0oJSJlr1yptLYDs4Yw31yW k0+LBATMoL+ZqA1n14CNQKWb06PgYvGe1+VPfhhaiodgVQmqdUY7bx2jipVzlu3K1dov z4JzuTZ7Qfyejm3RRJYr1nCLVW/yw9xGtQ8bGc1L21lp7x20H+r3VccUR/h8r5jAFIDg ZDpg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5h7N2NKUNcOZJmYob64G1mFF+D7FNeh+cUDVSfH3/CIzxHY9UbK SripQMUxpm9UyEp5skgyhjDQ+03v7Q==
X-Received: by 10.31.94.207 with SMTP id s198mr622627vkb.64.1502873057263; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 01:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.176.28.76 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 01:44:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1659363.yAWSxLQAC2@tums.local>
References: <149908054910.760.8140876567010458934.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAAiTEH8ntOerB6MGKMS2xcCK3TL9n4fyLq6F+bpUY6oTUpWN8w@mail.gmail.com> <CANLjSvWOzaJcVL64BhNFKnTUEgfq06TQtoy=ZNJ_JafvPU1aSA@mail.gmail.com> <1659363.yAWSxLQAC2@tums.local>
From: Davey Song <songlinjian@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 16:44:16 +0800
Message-ID: <CAAObRXJQx9o88erF1JvaXfQbvRY1j2nTwh1N=DrZw7QWs1Fncw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>, Lanlan Pan <abbypan@gmail.com>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114e5108b886c80556dae6bc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/E5Oj-i-TsJpX2xuts9LVMrnrTLw>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-pan-dnsop-swild-rr-type-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 08:44:20 -0000

On 12 August 2017 at 23:42, Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> wrote:

>
>
> failing that level of commitment, the IETF ought to kill DNSSEC altogether.
>
> this is very similar to the "shall we had IPv6's features to IPv4, since
> V6 is
> taking so long to deploy, and these features are badly needed?" debate.
>
>
+1.

If any operator would like to implement SWILD without DNSSEC or NAT44
without IPv6, It's OK. It maybe a good solution in their network for their
custormer. I do know many people and solutions walk around DNSSEC, IPv6
(due to IPsec) and TLS for surveillance issues. But IETF as a worldwide
standard body has its position on the technical path towards a better
Internet.

Davey

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email