Re: [DNSOP] Review of draft [draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-04.txt]

[Ólafur Guðmundsson <[e-mail]>]

John,

Thanks for the review
you are spot on, I should not edit while watching a soccer game :-(

I will post an updated version in the next few days.

how about for section 4.1:
I was trying to cover the case where the RRSET selected has Multiple
RRSIG's not

About 4.2.
Implementation may choose this when it can, if it can not for a zone then
fall back on 4.1

as for the guidance, I tried, but there are strong opinions out there and
.....

Olafur



On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:53 AM, Woodworth, John R <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Olafur,
>
> This is my first draft review so apologies if it seems harsh, I
> really like the concept of this draft.
>
>
> Comments:
>
> --
> Section 4.1 "Select one RRSet mode" -
>
> The section including "...choose a small one(s) to..." seems
> confusing, a single RRSet is expected why the possibility of
> multiple RRsets?
>
>
> --
> Section 4.2 "Synthesised HINFO RRset" -
>
> I do not follow the section including "...query includes DO=1...".
> Should the implementation fall back to the one-RRSet-mode?  If the
> only RRSet returned is a synthesized HINFO one, what does the
> returned RRSIG correspond to?
>
>
> --
> General -
>
> I would personally like to see more direction for implementers
> provided in the draft, e.g. expected configurable features.
> I realize this is a matter of personal taste.
>
>
> Thanks and good luck,
> John
>
> -- THESE ARE THE DROIDS TO WHOM I REFER:
> This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain
> confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this
> communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have
> received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender
> by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any
> attachments.
>