IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout-01.txt

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Thu, 21 February 2019 12:25 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722E7130FA9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 04:25:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bqbk8bRKkkqA for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 04:24:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A875130F9F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 04:24:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:51382) by ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.138]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1gwnPM-000G3H-09 (Exim 4.91) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Thu, 21 Feb 2019 12:24:56 +0000
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 12:24:55 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <9330E97B-76BF-4C6F-8F6F-01349A3E7427@isc.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1902211215480.19193@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <155053239541.25848.12960190085730298684.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <969D8BA1-6ED3-47E8-AFFD-2BEE8EA3E66B@bangj.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1902191219070.766@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <0DE33073-93B1-4CF5-B12D-B7266E21E8B2@timwattenberg.de> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1902191715230.30381@bofh.nohats.ca> <1F461BFA-638A-4607-84BD-F8B8597A1114@isc.org> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1902200028210.29865@bofh.nohats.ca> <646C86F6-C10D-43DF-ADE8-19222994E4D1@hopcount.ca> <E41DDEED-DF50-481F-9378-D721C3612643@isc.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1902201928250.19193@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <9330E97B-76BF-4C6F-8F6F-01349A3E7427@isc.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/EHzO-uC3FURG5bHZRLsPY_fF5jk>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout-01.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 12:25:02 -0000

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:
> > On 21 Feb 2019, at 6:30 am, Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> wrote:
> >
> > Does it need to be per-record? Why not GC the whole RRset?
>
> Because there are scenarios where you do want to GC as single
> record from the RRset. AD has them with SRV.  Each server adds
> its own SRV record to the RRset.

Oh I see, that makes sense. Things like this need explaining in the
document.

Why not simplify the RDATA format so there is just one item per record,
instead of containing a list of lists? Aren't the individual items going
to be added/removed independently of each other?

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Shannon, Rockall: Southerly or southeasterly 6 to gale 8, increasing severe
gale 9 at times, perhaps storm 10 later in northwest Rockall. Very rough or
high. Rain. Moderate or poor.

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status