Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-nygren-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc

Vladimír Čunát <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz> Mon, 07 October 2019 15:34 UTC

Return-Path: <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BABC11200DB for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 08:34:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W0pYnVuZad6Q for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 08:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [IPv6:2001:1488:800:400::400]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 961F412008C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 08:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:1488:fffe:6:cf5a:a7cf:e4a6:30b1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:1488:fffe:6:cf5a:a7cf:e4a6:30b1]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B17BE140817; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 17:34:07 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1570462447; bh=AdBruFm7epCpcxaTXZvCzevaYKELn5EfCXa3+ikZDoQ=; h=To:From:Date; b=MNzfvpN/zuzJjOk5ZYDR39zr2OrvmkYm6T0A/RggF1VbfGSwJ0zCV7amdS9SBDSP/ q4rE0KDWcev9DiFjP3KxBMdK621svzjBM/sONibVFjOZ0KRpu1yJk0bqapaXRpK1wE TUlFY897zH6h6ju3kg90+XtEd2ajJ/nBJLogB7qM=
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <CADyWQ+HwC5RztS0B3vVm9Sf4WrgLgb+4375wNH9Nj=1T4N=egA@mail.gmail.com> <fdbf72a6-f026-1126-ddf3-2dc64e04338d@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Vladimír Čunát <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz>
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Message-ID: <dfc4127a-46aa-6425-3a40-2839248a3043@nic.cz>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 17:34:07 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <fdbf72a6-f026-1126-ddf3-2dc64e04338d@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.100.3 at mail.nic.cz
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/EJNsC2PvTpbn0EE8Mi9jvbhuxyo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-nygren-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 15:34:12 -0000

Hello; I do support adoption.

On 10/7/19 4:52 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> The main caveat for me is I don't know if it'd be worth
> publishing an RFC if this doesn't end up getting deployed
> in browsers. So getting clarity there as early as poss
> would be good if we can.

I agree, but I wouldn't block *adoption* on that.  The "browsers" 
(client implementers) may have some comments on the contents of the text 
etc. and it seems much better to have one particular WG (and text) to 
discuss.  My understanding is that the authors had discussed with 
(some?) major implementers and they seemed inclined to like the 
approach.  (I heard that on some recent IETF presentations of HTTPSSVC 
plans, IIRC.)

--Vladimir