Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870C11A0263
 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 14:11:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id jXJ4TAVmD2C9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Sun, 21 Sep 2014 14:11:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com (mail-pa0-f51.google.com
 [209.85.220.51])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A3881A024C
 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 14:11:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id eu11so1529239pac.38
 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 14:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-type:message-id:mime-version
 :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to;
 bh=gWImtsXN2bTQk7hRVyQsAw5FLBlWd2QOAwogTljmzVk=;
 b=WrM3qPaphIdOWDfeagYSAibEsC+LmCcbftmpw/1d5sM556sQEQhEXLQhzVKlP2SUmw
 4GkSj+gqiDB6zaMadQ2AI5xnmj4jDBNp4hS05FUbINuh9G+jhUqitv5/5Vk3+AF94TO4
 clf/oocye+dusL9jC/B3EkQsERq1nBPpxANpstvp8dpasfjnpZcfCXoIWav0KsQYaSVg
 vfl9WUctNfTbl5nojSeCN04akTapaoMK+zRo8P6BRNam3sSE24YEsO6LRNd+sNem0l3W
 XgZ/cU5DtPV292bC+81gwS1BT4QihU2VaLxhCUtLsCQywcdAz14LY0jER5TAqui2c1uZ
 DjXA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn+C4RtZhTvV4A+EPUgv4zjI2YjvLa9/n15RdpV+vsb3O3yGojNbNdfXQW+7KJVmWUavMiA
X-Received: by 10.66.141.77 with SMTP id rm13mr20318598pab.91.1411333862447;
 Sun, 21 Sep 2014 14:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.11] ([73.162.11.38])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id l4sm7449360pdp.66.2014.09.21.14.11.01
 for <dnsop@ietf.org>
 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Sun, 21 Sep 2014 14:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
 boundary="Apple-Mail=_87EB530D-38CD-4D83-9FC4-617080D6EEF6";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Message-Id: <349FA254-AF50-457E-9504-A8707C5B57DB@virtualized.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 14:10:59 -0700
References: <20140921115222.GB16178@xs.powerdns.com>
 <541F1AE8.6010709@redbarn.org>
 <457731AF-E11F-4B1C-AC32-5E1AEE4EC5E5@gmail.com>
 <541F3D5A.7000205@dougbarton.us>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <541F3D5A.7000205@dougbarton.us>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/EKCWsKwFNNYlyjYAXPdWqL-rrvQ
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] fyi [Pdns-users] Please test: ALIAS/ANAME apex record
 in PowerDNS
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>,
 <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>,
 <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 21:11:05 -0000


--Apple-Mail=_87EB530D-38CD-4D83-9FC4-617080D6EEF6
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=windows-1252

On Sep 21, 2014, at 2:04 PM, Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> wrote:
> On 9/21/14 1:14 PM, Suzanne Woolf wrote:
>> This topic has come up here many times before,

And like the joke about the weather...

>> and there always seems to
>> be interest. A fielded implementation

There are at least three implementations of =91alias mechanism for zone =
apex=92 I=92m aware of (DNS Made Easy=92s ANAME, PowerDNS=92s ANAME =
(same thing?), and CloudFlare=92s =93CNAME Flattening=94). Not sure if =
they interoperable (or even if there is a need for interoperability).

>> and Paul's suggestion of an
>> interoperable spec both seem like healthy developments.
>=20
> As always I stand ready to revive =
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barton-clone-dns-labels-fun-profit if =
there is interest.

Given the end of the DNSEXT working group, perhaps there is sufficient =
interest to have a BOF (Bar, Beach, or otherwise) in Honolulu?

Regards,
-drc


--Apple-Mail=_87EB530D-38CD-4D83-9FC4-617080D6EEF6
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUHz7jAAoJENV6ebf0/4rX9C4H/0EUzEu3l+98Xl2N4S1upfQk
RycNbbcNWyZO56maHEUQd0/EibTNWuN4hhOaLxj9Tmh07KFd7JzTMYiBuUkv86Dc
Jrt7ZjKDEjVF64DJZKdHWo70vywL4dcCsr/kb/ztuhRIqhZMX+asmm7hHihy1oPJ
Z+v0G7L/KziLM9DogtVFw2uZ8w2jRi2ZuU/GAVgNt+TGmg7qgo3P6cM2f71vVS6I
FzKIbod4RYIakD43orpZX4CB2uHUHRBJioik7uIyg4Io390oh7ygghX5Tm/lzrjm
9hhRxlr5PDFJ5Ljlp7TdSfEZXfMs9NAfU+kEHthIHhRaFgu0lTc1x6O65lMJtZI=
=lCRH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_87EB530D-38CD-4D83-9FC4-617080D6EEF6--

