IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root-00.txt

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Wed, 06 April 2016 17:50 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3196012D6F0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:50:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qctJnckjhj40 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc0:41:216:3eff:fece:1902]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDF3B12D6EA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 4417A3283B; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 19:50:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by tyrion (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E87F9F015A1; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 19:47:24 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:47:24 -0300
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
Message-ID: <20160406174724.GB32154@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <CAKr6gn3rLUWD+qbKzOpqJ4a8RkA20HHmcQZ7jyNqbB5n+a5N=w@mail.gmail.com> <20160406172209.GA29730@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <CAKr6gn1paX05WgQhX43TBjJahhv3ExKHgW4KeJ49+LH7=H7hWA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAKr6gn1paX05WgQhX43TBjJahhv3ExKHgW4KeJ49+LH7=H7hWA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Ubuntu 15.10 (wily)
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ELPQBkih-u_jmH4qzvcePno70G0>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 17:50:38 -0000

On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 02:33:28PM -0300,
 George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> wrote 
 a message of 38 lines which said:

> I meant a form of signing, which would be a strong signal of
> repudiation of the label as well as exclusion of other holders of
> the label, so that it could be a first-class signal "not in the DNS"
> -> look in another internet-name lookup mechanism.

The proposal in my draft is technically trivial and easy to implement
(politically, it is another matter) because it relies only on existing
techniques.

Your proposal is interesting but would require the development of
protocol changes and their implementation.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email