IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] `localhost` and DNS.

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Thu, 16 November 2017 00:01 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624161292FD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 16:01:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7Tt2Srl-Ke14 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 16:01:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22b.google.com (mail-wr0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A35F4129353 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 16:01:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id y42so21924705wrd.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 16:01:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6TE8FhlOubUv15oeA7Gc7sbQokvhMDs9XAM8wsbj610=; b=YBNrBSX0qV50chuJg+HSOr5fc2drOyza8g5XP0LkQgwb6V6jZm5fLlFcOZF7jG/1Mi NkF03SdjJt5+Kd/Rg9pqNY+Wj+gbPzqeW8iehUYxcALVlOeF8o48+OqfkyMvT3DOS+iB ILAUK9ozcAspus+vhq0a9nHwRKfW+fUw5299OP2lIFGztjEOTetsTyuY8310hEbFMxoC eVZSwSP8o6iSUySUMUzRXE9KA8N96K5n++jgrgzyziktdTnPBEYcyDwGz1C7y8Jl6Qbt 5Rrv4O/wI2Rqtf/9KpqePoWkC2hLLIHr6z8+7Ecem2t4FKssnaDB9y4KI10AT78YK2gN 4v7Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6TE8FhlOubUv15oeA7Gc7sbQokvhMDs9XAM8wsbj610=; b=eENEY1LWMJEed6kolTZ8WXAbMPwwQ2ERLvKWYxhLQmfxO/2Xk0kPP+w8sWIn3eskgY LBnhi+JCs0+PytKeesDkjsLceuzBhPXInIK/CRfJBbXoUXI/Hq/vVJGkXrszpzRo+qPS EPKwo+AJjwcMk++v3DIPOAP/CXGiQZdMPi6RqcJ+NZzdQtstORLOJtzf1YZ1zhtlW8OX 46XGlz4TG00NPomuwoSHlzbBI8n5SJrv+lMEpygbE0/xQal3Vnedbvbummo7AjkWbkNk +klA/TvQ656N/UgecjlRvVfYPUhQMIwieqwYw5fmM3OMZKr+T4q/lL6z9VBcNe5rMcwu q3NQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX7S7HxHLTfdSxon0g+Cn2eYuGbTz2toV7ngxyMUnRXRG3HOKJrv 8WgJ7/jZtUe0R+3STTdjC2SaNia60QzIMDRAIvqUKw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbTKMA2KetANvSI33akAPjuNW/HIvUMKiVcPvhmQi+47Ks4BZkNzfoGJv9LNRhk2BHhFIGwZegHx7cmBIKPLl8=
X-Received: by 10.223.169.100 with SMTP id u91mr304284wrc.108.1510790510094; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 16:01:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.174.81 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 16:01:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <57BD04DF-B473-41B8-9ECD-D197232365FB@fugue.com>
References: <CAKXHy=dgQmAgsTaNWpj3dYPN2nv7UnZLbe58A9vmya3JNdmHeQ@mail.gmail.com> <57BD04DF-B473-41B8-9ECD-D197232365FB@fugue.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 08:01:49 +0800
Message-ID: <CAL02cgRjSyzXYvSF1v3C1AwRwnTkpzFnGa4FRCBGGm-diT-XNg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045cf7ecaf3b41055e0e532e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/EMJZlVuyPQzNVizfbPGuPYSOhxU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] `localhost` and DNS.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 00:01:54 -0000

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 5:05 AM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:

> On Nov 15, 2017, at 10:51 PM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote:
>
> Skimming through the recording of Monday's meeting
> <https://play.conf.meetecho.com/Playout/?session=IETF100-DNSOP-20171113-0930> (starting
> at around 53:56), it sounds to me as though there's at least loose
> agreement that signing a response for `localhost` is not what we'd like to
> recommend: all the folks who commented explicitly took that position for
> similar reasons. The current text in https://tools.ietf.org/
> html/draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localhost-be-localhost-01#section-4.2 reflects
> this position, and IMO it's what we should run with.
>
>
> Yes, the current text appears to me to be correct.
>

+1



>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email