Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nxdomain-cut-00.txt

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Sun, 27 December 2015 21:35 UTC

Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 22:35:12 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20151227213512.GA10225@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <20151227212349.1121.48629.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151227212349.1121.48629.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/EQ8NAH6CKJ7jt3VHjMOeyvcD32s>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nxdomain-cut-00.txt
Precedence: list

On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 01:23:49PM -0800,
 internet-drafts@ietf.org <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote 
 a message of 44 lines which said:

>         Title           : NXDOMAIN really means there is nothing underneath
>         Authors         : Stephane Bortzmeyer
>                           Shumon Huque
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-dnsop-nxdomain-cut-00.txt

This follows the Call for Adoption and its result. The main changes
from the previous non-WG document are:

* new text for the "Rules" section, the heart of the RFC, to be
  implementation-independent

* new concept, "denied name" (the NXDOMAIN does not always refer to
  the QNAME, see RFC 6604)

* new text for the DNSSEC case (NSEC* records to return)

* new implementation, Unbound

* move the discussion on the use of the SOA in an appendix

But now it's a WG document, the working group can command :-)

[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nxdomain-cut… internet-drafts
Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nxdomain… Stephane Bortzmeyer