IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Interim Meeting on Special Names and RFC 6761

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Sat, 02 May 2015 18:23 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70E81A8871 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 May 2015 11:23:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.677
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.677 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CSyYUkh-2bNu for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 May 2015 11:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com (mail-wg0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36B5B1A8731 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 May 2015 11:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wgin8 with SMTP id n8so115836819wgi.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 02 May 2015 11:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Zya67bxPJiktSt+OHud5QH+k9zXzTv0u4X32wSAtR5c=; b=erhTl0D4Gh62GArngn+6b/w5jLK+5a0Svln41/UPVZKBoOZH8wLO1MrVJRLpEuVKkR /mP/G2gk6Icc1Dk4ThMBFt/Ia/+tpUOWmzdF/sTNUv+AVVPktDO+iuwwSspO0AFVLMRy 7atVEH/2elQYyUMOKRdkufmL17k+gptLj70LuaQGUttO8e4FjuJ61TczPzFagBYkr/nc dl7AX3a2k+gQ3/BEIRUv/mB+E4kJXB0vCmPbSSDmmxvQsLurkpa1iFlAg5xGUhTwPEjz yNDrUptr5qivd1ezlya/JR2ce2OZsukg6Jba0U5gqEZC0OjK55ROMkP4arolJVSX29GI 4pUw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmUjul2TKipWXVxTu+NFFnKqYeCT0LjPa7TYK4k88RRzbbOMoFZAGvgw9chO/NLnlzFG+O1
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.101.65 with SMTP id fe1mr6442595wib.22.1430590999902; Sat, 02 May 2015 11:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.47.36 with HTTP; Sat, 2 May 2015 11:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9F0284A5-8B69-400B-B5C7-45152F0EB811@frobbit.se>
References: <201504300855.t3U8tChg055723@bela.nlnetlabs.nl> <CAHw9_iJzZP04XaazGbNauScVwGgJwwuSycbQK9G+Q1FPxBruPg@mail.gmail.com> <D167DA18.667D%alain.durand@icann.org> <9F0284A5-8B69-400B-B5C7-45152F0EB811@frobbit.se>
Date: Sat, 02 May 2015 14:23:19 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iKTPvyVgFy4qXKr4JWG1o_pTYLD3DMEOwbr1s4GVKCmug@mail.gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
To: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d041826be5e53bf05151d6c3d"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ETpVbxnleyeymq_qgZO2anB-7T4>
Cc: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, Alain Durand <alain.durand@icann.org>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Interim Meeting on Special Names and RFC 6761
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 May 2015 18:23:22 -0000

+1

W

On Friday, May 1, 2015, Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se> wrote:

> On 30 Apr 2015, at 19:10, Alain Durand wrote:
>
> > On 4/30/15, 11:23 AM, "Warren Kumari" <warren@kumari.net <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> The RIPE staff has been very nice and made a room available at RIPE-70
> >> <https://ripe70.ripe.net/>:
> >>
> >>   Meerman I/II for ~30 people on Tuesday 12 May 18:00- 20:00 Amsterdam
> >>
> >>       Jaap
> >
> >
> >
> > Very cool. Do we need to sign up?
>
> Ill be there!
>
>    paf
>


-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in
the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of
pants.
   ---maf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email